Jump to content

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q50,41: Difference between revisions

From LithoGraphica
Newer edit →
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
18,774 edits
copy markup from Q56,54
 
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
18,774 edits
thing-in-itself / type specimen / using Wikiprime senses as if they were Characteristics
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Hue|style=HueCSS|ff1=DFy}}
{{Hue|style=HueCSS|ff1=DFy}}


<li {{IS1/IK/class}} data-qid="50,41" value="5041">noumenon (Kant)
{{li|start=y|I=S1/IK|Q=50,41|Q2=5041}}thing-in-itself; {{i|lang=de|Ding an sich}} (Kant) / noumenon (Kant)
 
{{li|I=F1/IK|Q=50,41|Q2=5041}}thing-in-itself  ->  I want to say that explanations of reality known to be incorrect should be F Items when they are in a swatch that suggests they're taking place in the real world, while they can be S Items when they are in a swatch that suggests they're taking place in a fictional world where they could conceivably make sense.
 
{{li|I=S1/IK/Fy|Q=50,41|Q2=5041}}thing-in-itself (fiction) / {{QSense|50|41|S=FF}}


{{endHue}}
{{endHue}}


== Related ==
== Related ==
<!--
{{Hue|ff1=DFy}}
{{Hue|ff1=DFy}}


{{li|start=y|I=Z1/MLP|Q=10,2,71|Q2=10271}}
{{li|start=y|I=S1/MW|Q=618|Q2=618}}type specimen ({{int:sitename}}) <!-- LithoGraphica --> / {{QSense|618|S=YX}}
 
{{li|I=S1/MW|Q=618|Q2=618}}quod-vide entry ({{int:sitename}}) / {{QSense|618|S=QV}} , {{QSense|618|S=QU}} , {{QSense|618|S=QW}} , {{QSense|618|S=QY}}  ->  those all look good. I feel like QX and QZ should be used for something more significant though I don't know what<br/>
for connecting Kantianism to Kant... maybe QK or QA? motif to author is a similar relationship to {{i|quod vide}} entries


{{endHue}} -->
{{li|I=S1/MW|Q=618|Q2=618}}using Wikiprime senses as if they were Characteristics / using Hue sense-labels as if they were Properties; as predicate statements  -> I just realized that the more standard Sense labels exist, the more they just turn into a different way to do Wikibase Properties. you can either have "thing-in-itself - described by author - Kant" or "thing-in-itself - sense 'most obvious author' - Kant". there are somewhere from 600 to 1300 distinct relations possible that way (26 × 52).<br/>
it only works for Item to Item relations and not for putting arbitrary data in Characteristics, with the one exception being arbitrary aliases used to refer to something which can be multilingual strings.
 
{{endHue}}


== {{int:hue-prototype-trads-fields-or-genres}} ==  <!-- en: Ideologies or fields -->
== {{int:hue-prototype-trads-fields-or-genres}} ==  <!-- en: Ideologies or fields -->
{{Hue|ff1=DFy}}
{{Hue|ff1=DFy}}
{{li |start=y
{{li |start=y
     |I=Z1/IK|Q=50,99|Q2=5099|S=}}{{TTS|IK|I.K.}} / Kant
     |I=Z1/IK|Q=50,99|Q2=5099|S=QK}}{{TTS|IK|I.K.}} / Kant
{{endHue}}
{{endHue}}


== Wavebuilder combinations ==
== Wavebuilder combinations ==
<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild three">
{{WL|ff1=DFy}}


{{WaveBuild| {{E:Q618/ES|??}} | -- | -- }}  <!-- en: Along With, Produces  ??  ?? -->
{{WaveBuild| {{E:Q618/ES|??}} | -- | -- }}  <!-- en: Along With, Produces  ??  ?? -->


</dl>
{{endWL}}
<!--


== Subpages or related scraps ==
== Subpages or related scraps ==
<!--
* [[EC:9k/RD/Q618/...]]
* [[EC:9k/RD/Q618/...]]
=== Nickels ===
* {{nickel/silent}} [[Research talk:5c/|]]


-->
-->
[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]  <!-- page ends here.  TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming
[[Category:Next nine thousand (RD)]]  <!-- page ends here.  TTS-unfriendly numbers incoming
redirects or titles:  [[Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q5041]]
redirects or titles:  [[Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q5041]]
duplication hint:  copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|Q50,41]]
duplication hint:  copy markup from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|Q50,41]] -->
 
old Hue markup:
<ol class="hue clean  {{int:hue-ixn-classname-DFy}}">  inactive: {{int:hue-ixn-classname-ML}}
-->

Revision as of 05:12, 29 October 2026

Main entry

  1. thing-in-itself; Ding an sich (Kant) / noumenon (Kant)
  2. thing-in-itself -> I want to say that explanations of reality known to be incorrect should be F Items when they are in a swatch that suggests they're taking place in the real world, while they can be S Items when they are in a swatch that suggests they're taking place in a fictional world where they could conceivably make sense.
  3. thing-in-itself (fiction) / Q50,41-FF "Q50-41 FF"

Related

  1. type specimen (LithoGraphica) / Q618-YX "Q618 YX"
  2. quod-vide entry (LithoGraphica) / Q618-QV "Q618 QV" , Q618-QU "Q618 QU" , Q618-QW "Q618 QW" , Q618-QY "Q618 QY" -> those all look good. I feel like QX and QZ should be used for something more significant though I don't know what
    for connecting Kantianism to Kant... maybe QK or QA? motif to author is a similar relationship to quod vide entries
  3. using Wikiprime senses as if they were Characteristics / using Hue sense-labels as if they were Properties; as predicate statements -> I just realized that the more standard Sense labels exist, the more they just turn into a different way to do Wikibase Properties. you can either have "thing-in-itself - described by author - Kant" or "thing-in-itself - sense 'most obvious author' - Kant". there are somewhere from 600 to 1300 distinct relations possible that way (26 × 52).
    it only works for Item to Item relations and not for putting arbitrary data in Characteristics, with the one exception being arbitrary aliases used to refer to something which can be multilingual strings.

Ideologies, fields, or genres

  1. pronounced I.K. / Kant

Wavebuilder combinations

pronounced P: pronounced Wave-builder: forms result [Item]
--
along with [Item]
?? (pronounced proposed / ES)1-1-1
forming from [Item]
?? (pronounced proposed / ES)1-1-1
--
--

Subpages or related scraps

Retrieved from "https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Ontology_talk:9k/RD/Q50,41&oldid=47023"