Philosophical Research:RatingHub/YT/Miscellaneous

Rating subject: miscellaneous YouTube video channels

• This sheet is purely for the purpose of testing the new rating rubric and what questions should be included. It isn't to be taken very seriously.

field, scope, or group [Item]

miscellaneous

overall rating

(N/A)

Rating sheet

contained work

Arcane Was Always Centrist

rating

NG / Not Good 1:(-)1:(-)1

tests

"Object" [fail]

1

contained work

Biden's "You Ain't Black" Gaffe: A Logical Breakdown

rating

NG / Not Good 1:(-)1:(-)1

tests

"Question-begging"/NG "Descartes"/NG

2

Earliest tests

contained work

Indie games are the enemy now (sic ×2)

rating

NG / Not Good 1:(-)1:(-)1

r

5-18

tests

"Question-begging"/NG

1

contained work

"Culture as an additional scale of biological organisation"

rating

U / Unknown 1:(-)1:(-)1

r

5-18

tests

"Scientific" [pass]

"Historical" [pass]

"Dirac" [fail]

3

contained work

Once You Know This, Every PSYOP Becomes Obvious (sic)

rating

NG / Not Good 1:(-)1:(-)1

r

5-18

tests

"Figurehead"/NG

1

contained work

Why the Soviet Union was obsessed with corn

rating

NG / Not Good 1:(-)1:(-)1

r

5-18

tests

"Historical" [fail]

1

contained work

Were the Black Panthers tankies?

rating

G / Good 1:(-)1:(-)1

r

5-17

tests

"Historical" [pass] [P] (pronounced [P]) "Dirac test" [rating] "Figurehead"/NG "Floyd"/G

4

contained work

Why were there SO MANY PENGUINS in the 2000s!???

rating

G / Good 1:(-)1:(-)1

r

5-17

tests

[P] (pronounced [P]) Scientific consensus test [rating] [P] (pronounced [P]) Historical accuracy test [rating] "Billboard"

3