Philosophical Research talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
Add topic →Name: LithoGRAPHica |
→Name: LithoGRAPHica ftw |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
** litho-graph-ica. [http://paleofile.com/Dinosaurs/Aves/Archaeopteryx.asp] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithographic_limestone] I'm in-between on whether I like that or not — RD | ** litho-graph-ica. [http://paleofile.com/Dinosaurs/Aves/Archaeopteryx.asp] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithographic_limestone] I'm in-between on whether I like that or not — RD | ||
*** it combines the notions of "stone monkey", "graph theory", and "transitional forms" / "populations of one kind or structure transitioning to populations of another kind". but I'm not sure if I like it — <span style="display: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg);" aria-hidden="true" title="tyrannosaur rampant inverted">🦖</span> [[User:Reversedragon|R.D.]] ([[User talk:Reversedragon|talk]]) 08:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC) | *** it combines the notions of "stone monkey", "graph theory", and "transitional forms" / "populations of one kind or structure transitioning to populations of another kind". but I'm not sure if I like it — <span style="display: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg);" aria-hidden="true" title="tyrannosaur rampant inverted">🦖</span> [[User:Reversedragon|R.D.]] ([[User talk:Reversedragon|talk]]) 08:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
*** No, "Litho<i>graph</i>ica" is a great name. If we make the logo a dinosaur I'm almost sure it will give the whole thing more appeal <br />[[User:Valenoern|Valenoern]] ([[User_talk:Valenoern|talk]]) 05:12, 2 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:12, 2 February 2025
Name[edit]
- I'll list out my top thoughts for naming this thing here. — R.D. (talk) 08:39, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- golden light — RD
- Chrysopedia - cool idea but my first thought every time is "who's Chris?" — RD
- list. ontology. graph. node. uh — RD
- facticity. fracture. Fracticity? Tatsächlichkeit. Faktizität. — RD
- ontodex. signidex. signifidex. entidex. — RD
- litho-graph-ica. [1] [2] I'm in-between on whether I like that or not — RD
- it combines the notions of "stone monkey", "graph theory", and "transitional forms" / "populations of one kind or structure transitioning to populations of another kind". but I'm not sure if I like it — R.D. (talk) 08:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- No, "Lithographica" is a great name. If we make the logo a dinosaur I'm almost sure it will give the whole thing more appeal
Valenoern (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2025 (UTC)