User:RD/9k/to each according to his work (Q28,85)

Motif

to each according to his work -> this always stuck out at me as odd because of the way it's exactly how markets work. I don't have any moral issues with it, but I find it theoretically confusing.
in Bolshevism there is no absolute equality / absolute equalitarianism is the product of a small peasant economy; (in Bolshevism) there can be no absolute equality (Mao) [1]

The State and Revolution (Lenin 1918/1920) / (9k) -> motif appears in chapter 5. [2]
On correcting mistaken ideas in the party (Mao 1929) [3]

When China chopped up the country into corporations leading to uneven results, it naturally resulted in uneven opinions about the reform period [4] [5]
paymentism
(meta-Marxism) -> I need a name for the concept that people piling up a stack of economic value as individuals and paying somebody inherently stimulates everyone to grow the economy and be in harmony, as in Liberal capitalism, Bolshevism, and Deng Xiaoping Thought, as well as any number of agorisms that lead to Liberal-republicanism. specifically referring to This Thing as its own process that can be isolated and described and in the beginning operates like a metallic rule that can start with just a few people. specifically referring to a thing which is inside agorisms and inside capitalism, I have no idea what this thing is normally called, so a made-up word will have to do.