9k:RD/ Why isn't your theory forbidden? (Q26,65)

Main entry

Why isn't your theory forbidden?
/ If your theory of anarchism, etc., can overturn all hierarchies, why hasn't it been forbidden as a threat to the existing order? -> a question political-agorists never seem to seriously ask themselves. really felt this trying to read Foucault. there are a few anarchists that pass this bar only technically and dubiously by being willing to Zinovievize society for nothing in return, thus becoming "forbidden". not the way I would prefer that a theory fix itself, but it passes through this contradiction at the very least. back to agorist political philosophy. why does it act like it's the most radical thing ever when it never stops to ask what it is or isn't disrupting