User:RD/9k/pinning False to anecdotes (Q642)

Main entry

pinning False to anecdotes / pinning True to specific incident / pinning True to oddly-specific outcome / pegging truth values to oddly specific outcomes ->
I have problems with critical-theory doing this because of how specific it gets without realizing how specific it got, but at the same time, it's an interesting concept if you look at it in its totality and think about all the possible ways you could do it. I independently invented it on my own with early Trotskyism before I even had any idea that critical-theory was doing it. then, after puppetting the concept of Liberal-republicanism ironically I finally realized that pointing to the need to resolve court cases, or pointing to the need to get rid of "prejudice" was the same thing. each example has weaknesses in that other sociophilosophies won't think it's important, but when you take a reasonably diverse array of examples together you see a clearer picture start to form of what all the examples are actually saying.

Desired (truth value) / desirable outcome (truth value)
Undesired (truth value) / undesirable outcome (truth value)
Oppressing early Trotskyism is Undesired
/ In the First World Trotsky is sacred / (9k/Q29,84, Q41,91) -> widely repeated by Liberal-republicanism, but also approved by Trotskyists; something of a classic.