Jump to content

User:RD/9k/Palestine conflict (Q19,77)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
Revision as of 05:29, 25 June 2026 by Reversedragon (talk | contribs) (Israeli houses are guilty / senses)

Main entry

  1. Palestine conflict (1917-; history) -> so, people sometimes get a little upset when you mention Israel as a part of the Palestine conflict because they say it goes too far toward legitimizing Israel. I'm tired. I'm not here to argue about what's the correct way to say it. I have no real objections on dropping 'Israel' from this entry, given how this site isn't a social platform based on a capitalist owning an agora and I'm not going to get "demonetized and shadowbanned" just for saying the word Palestine instead of hiding it behind the word Israel. why not do it the other way? at least this way, it will be especially easy to visually distinguish the blue and khaki senses of this Item.
  2. Israel-Palestine conflict (1917-; global empire) [1]

Timeline

  1. Balfour declaration of 1917 [2] -> declaration which proposed Israel. Britain actually tried to be all 'tent of freedom poles' about it and claim there was a way to protect Palestinians at the same time as creating Israel. although we can see how that went.
  2. U.N. vote for two-state solution (Palestine; 1947) [3]
  3. Founding of Israel (1948)
  4. Arab-Israeli war of 1948 [4] / Israel independence war / Nakba
  5. expulsion of Jews to Israel (1949-1967) [5] [6]

Related

  1. Palestine is not complicated / (9k)
  2. metanarrative (philosophy) [7] -> this keeps getting brought up in Palestine discussions, because apparently people judge their entire conception of what history is by countries that have been involved in United States wars and other countries that don't serve the purpose of drawing a frame around the United States aren't important.
  3. Israeli houses are guilty / If Israel exploded, then good / If North Korea blew up all the buildings in Israel but somehow didn't kill a single human being, it would be a good decision that either improves life on earth or is ethical -> everything I hear about geopolitics is severely confusing to me on every level and I am constantly baffled as to why any of it matters. it all sounds like word salad. I feel like investigating this proposition is the closest I can come to ever understanding any of it.
    like, if this was true, why would it be true? I don't understand any of the whys of anything that happens now. it all feels completely senseless and in some ways "unimportant". I can't explain the disconnect I feel between the prospect of Israelis wiping out Palestinians being horrible and the feeling I get every time anybody talks about the Palestine conflict that it's a totally unimportant discourse that doesn't matter and it's equivalent to Tories sweeping all issues off the table and making the only US political issue trans rights so people only debate trans people in bathrooms for the rest of human existence.

Wavebuilder combinations

pronounced P: pronounced Wave-builder: forms result [Item]
Immutable justice cannot exist if the borders of Palestine or Israel and the living conditions of the people inside can change
forming from [Item]
Israel-Palestine conflict (pronounced proposed / PT)1-1-1
immutable justice (pronounced proposed / A)1-1-1
Immutable justice cannot exist if the borders of Palestine or Israel and the living conditions of the people inside can change

Ideologies or fields

  1. PT / global empire
  2. P4 / Zionism
  3. pronounced Hass / Israel