Jump to content

9k:RD/ Why isn't your theory forbidden? (Q26,65)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
Revision as of 22:54, 18 August 2026 by Reversedragon (talk | contribs) (copy markup from Q90)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Main entry

  1. Why isn't your theory forbidden?

    / If your theory of anarchism, etc., can overturn all hierarchies, why hasn't it been forbidden as a threat to the existing order? -> a question Existentialists never seem to seriously ask themselves. really felt this trying to read Foucault. there are a few anarchists that pass this bar only technically and dubiously by being willing to Zinovievize society for nothing in return. not the way I would prefer that a theory fix itself, but, back to Existentialism. why does it act like it's the most radical thing ever when it never stops to ask what it is or isn't disrupting

Related

Ideologies or fields

  1. pronounced M.X. / meta-Marxism
  2. pronounced M.N. / Leninism