Jump to content

User:RD/9k/ Prejudices are not obviously bad (Q24,51)

From Philosophical Research
Revision as of 05:14, 30 December 2025 by Reversedragon (talk | contribs) (Colonialism is common sense / Settler-colonialism is "better" than Bolshevism / Maliciously expelling any significantly large subpopulation from a country either through scattering that population or massacring that population ... is settler-colonialism)

Prototype notes

  1. Prejudices are not obviously bad / It is not inherently obvious to everybody in an equal way through an equal path that prejudices are bad -> the claim that it is difficult to realize prejudices are bad, even if they are bad. most prejudices that center-Liberals would consider "good" are not obvious as prejudices unless you look closely, but they sure do exist.
    some Existentialist theories like poststructuralism and schizoanalysis appear to believe this. there are different ways to cast this proposition: MX) prejudices are not obviously bad, so it is not possible to simply convince everyone prejudices being bad is obvious and have that be the truth because it will never be obvious. you need to convince people of something that actually includes prejudices being impossible to operate on directly. W) prejudices are not obviously bad, so we all need to force each other to question prejudices and force everyone to believe prejudices are bad no matter how much effort it takes.
    you can see the shovel dreams unraveling. typical Gramscians aren't actually relying on the solid, material regeneration of any substrate of a workers' state, they're just I-believe-that-everybodying people.

Related

  1. Colonialism is common sense / To ordinary people, colonialism is the accepted and intuitive way of doing things in the same sense that Liberal "democracy" is, almost to the point that criticizing it is unreasonably extreme / (9k/Q29,83)