Philosophical Research:Molecular Democracy/5.1r/2001 communist-trump
if capitalism disappeared tomorrow if capitalism were gone by tomorrow morning a world where capitalism is gone tomorrow morning tomorrow comes, and capitalism is gone it is now tomorrow. capitalism is gone.
it is tomorrow morning. capitalism is gone.
Donald Trump, Bill O'Reily, Bill Gates, and Alex Jones would want to rid the world of all capitalism. everyone would go on and on about how capitalism is an insult to Free Will, makes some nebulous and remote "us" less human, and makes it impossible to ever create Our Democracy let alone save it.
this is because it could not be otherwise. fascism being a specialized form of nationalism, the celebration of what people believe to be unique to their local population detached from others, it is impossible for it to be created out of anything but the special, unique characteristics of a particular population's daily life and unique local history. of course, the same thing is also true of any other republican societal structure, including Liberalism and Bolshevism. if one is to create Liberalism in the United States, it will be specifically the unique characteristics of the United States which form Liberalism. likewise, it is only the unique characteristics of the United States population which can act as a medium which will materially realize Bolshevism. as we covered in "free will": Sonic is not interchangeable with Tails, Knuckles, or Shadow, and if Sonic is to transform into Super Sonic it is not the logical result that he transforms his entire being into Super Shadow, no matter how many Chaos Emeralds are shared between Shadow's aims and Sonic's transformation.
how far this goes will depend on how strictly we are using the term identity in the mathematical sense, the identity of any individual or group generally must be defined . if we are speaking of identity in the mathematical sense, then there is quite literally no form of culture which does not issue from a corresponding identity.
it is not inevitable that merely by deeply understanding the claims of a religion someone would believe in any religion but when it comes to capitalism, it is inevitable that if someone properly understood the physical definition of capitalism they would at least come to believe in the negation of capitalism.
it is actually rather up in the air whether any variation of Marxism carries inevitability with it much like the case of religion, it is not necessarily inevitable that simply by understanding all of it and becoming an expert in its claims anyone comes to believe specifically in Stalin Thought or specifically in Trotskyism this is the case for several reasons. one is that the process of constructing Bolshevism has never been completed and nobody has a full complement of objective facts on the process of constructing Bolshevism. there are endless textbooks about the agreed-on, tried-and-tested way to do Liberalism, but no form of Bolshevism has any such completed manual, assuming that we are referring to the material arena of the real world.
colonial sponsors / indentured servants. leverage by older generations. leverage by Artisans or non-immigrants deliberately plugging up the spatial slot hierarchy to keep others from coming in. individual people colonially own towns one by one. doesn't seem obvious within a single generation, but becomes more obvious when anyone is born.
the united states purports to be about "freedom" and "independence" but thanks to its fine structure at the local levels it in fact has the least independence of anywhere