From Philosophical Research
Main entry[edit]
- 2938
Gramscianism & Dengism are related
/ Gramscianism and Deng Xiaoping Thought are related -> the more I would think about it, the more I would realize, huh, it's almost like one of them is tiny and one of them is big and that's the only serious difference. aside from that it's only similarities. the bourgeoisie rush to defend the borders or frontiers of a countable culture to protect ethnic groups from being dominated or dispersed across the world by outside populations, and Marxist theorists have to reluctantly let it happen. (or at least they believe they do.) the process of securing frontiers from outside populations naturally results in a shepherd sheet of theorists and bureaucrats, but doesn't naturally result in proletarian structures. (it's only my hypothesis that Gramscianism would produce another China, but I think there's decent reason to think that, as far as the "there's just a capitalism inside it and no Bolshevism" part. you point out that Gramscianism is just a bunch of progressive bourgeoisie squabbling against reactionary bourgeoisie and it's like, yeah, how else could it go? I'm hesitant to say the same thing about Stalin's Marxism though, considering it didn't have the same result as Deng Xiaoping Thought and there was actually some Bolshevism in it. the content that ideologies realize is very important to me. so if Stalin's Marxism realizes Bolshevism even somewhat, there had to be something right in that historical period that Stalin couldn't possibly ruin by getting everyone onto his cause. now, as for Trotskyism... I consider it very suspect for never actually realizing any of its content, but I give it a couple points for constantly claiming the internal structure of the Soviet Union was wrong and thereby implying it does have specific content it wants to realize instead.)
Positive reasons[edit]
- 2198
Gramscianism is molecular Dengism
/ Gramscianism is already molecular Deng Xiaoping Thought -> this is nearly the same statement as Deng Xiaoping Thought being global Gramscianism, but slightly different. the other statement is that Deng Xiaoping Thought has "Trotskyized" Gramscianism by multiplying it over a big area. this statement is that Gramscianism and Deng Xiaoping Thought are the same because they have the same internal structure, and they would be the same on the inside if they each started with only 5,000 people or so. if both statements are true they're synonymous. if exactly one of them is false then they aren't the same statement.
Negative reasons[edit]
Strawberry justifies class collaboration
/ Strawberry swatch comes from justifying class collaboration / Gramscianism, Deng Xiaoping Thought, and late Juche-socialism all share a concept of justifiable class collaboration to defend against capitalist encroachment into the material territory of a Third World national population or an emerging intra- Liberal-republican nationality in the form of a supposedly defensive center-Liberal and blue-anarchist faction or in the form of a minority-demographic subpopulation; this is to imply that in general an appearance of the strawberry swatch color is rooted specifically in asserting "justified" class collaboration -> I used to give more leeway to ink-brush Marxism until I learned that North Korea had literally turned into Deng Xiaoping Thought by any reasonable material model. and then I was like, hey, wait a minute, integrating them is one thing but socialism isn't supposed to be multiplying the bourgeoisie.
Ideologies[edit]
- DX / Deng Xiaoping Thought
- JC / Juche-socialism
- W / Gramscianism
- MX / meta-Marxism
- MX onto DX
- MX onto JC
- MX onto W
