User:RD/9k/anti-Jake theory (Q618)

Main entry

anti-Jake theory
-> a model or organization that has been rebuked by "Jake", the Marxist theorist who was once a real person, but in order to protect the guilty and keep from stirring up back-and-forth arguments that could cloud an objective analysis of what he is saying, is now a hypothetical archetype. this shouldn't be an Item, but Jake's positions have been so bizarrely inconsistent that it's impossible to tell whether these positions are accurate or informative or anything just by what things they go against.
anti-Jake theory
-> not to be confused with Jake (Fazbear Frights), or Jake the dog (Adventure Time). "Jake" was literally the first name that popped into my head when I had to think of an alternate name. it is kind of conceptually funny to imagine him depicted as Jake the dog though, as if Rainicorns are somehow actually an interesting allegory for the conflict between North Korean Marxism and other Marxisms. their personalities are not very similar but I'm a sucker for unnecessarily complicated allegories like that

Transgender issues are not "tertiary cultural issues"
-> because of the contributions of "Jake" ... to the peripheries of Marxist theory it might be just fine to mark this part of mainstream Marxism-Leninism [...]. it's still pretty widely believed in places like China and Iraq that they are tertiary, but I think this is in error.

U.S. antiwar movements have always been Idealist
/ Marxist Jake believes Leninism is forming a Materialist social-democratic party, filtering it into a party-nation, and somehow filling it with workers. By Jake's definition, no anti-war movement in the United States has ever been a Marxist movement / (9k)