"Bolshevik organization": [2] [warning: not an actual URL, entire page squashed into javascript interface]
Nickel usage or significance
(fill in later)
Motifs or claims
618How can one uphold multiple figures that conflict with one another? -> wonderful question! there are actually ways to do it. there's the bad way Existentialists do it which is to regard all ideologies through group-positivism, and then there's the Materialist way where you regard all the countable Marxisms as material objects that all have to interact on a global scale. you want to take the best subset of these theorists and the worker Lattices inside their countries that all approximately fits together but also promotes actually getting to Bolshevism instead of getting stuck in strawberry Marxism. that's it. it's not a conundrum in and of itself.
618If you uphold Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Hoxha, Che Guevara, Ho Chi Minh, and Kwame Nkrumah at the same time your theory must contain an error because these theorists are in conflict -> I see only about one point of conflict in here which is that Ho Chi Minh and possibly Che at times condoned strawberry Marxism and the other ones practiced crimson Marxism. but I don't know who Kwame Nkrumah is and how much they could have distorted Marxism.
Nkrumah: he promoted Pan-Africanism. I see. a thing that some people don't like. I'm confused on how bad this is because. it seems to me like there are many possible "poly" structures you could build across Africa that wouldn't be a problem. aren't there many different kinds of Pan-Africanism in theory that all get back up to the full continent from the small scale differently? I guess one of the biggest problems that could come up in the middle of that is nationalism and failing to redraw internal borders. but other than that isn't joining African countries to each other better than trying to join them to anything outside Africa where nobody actually understands the conditions?
618Hoxha's actual principles distinct from mainstream Marxism-Leninism
