Jump to content

User:RD/9k/leaping State process (Q618)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
Revision as of 21:36, 20 April 2026 by Reversedragon (talk | contribs) (copy markup from 9k/Q618-SecularAnimism)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Main entry

  1. leaping State process (meta-Marxist term; meta-Marxism onto Toryism) -> possibly attested in other things under other names. the motif that all populations of people, as soon as they are clusters of friends containing particular Bauplan elements, a group of frontier farmers with fences or whatnot, generate a State from inside their Group Subject because they are a socially-linked group of people, and if they come in contact with another group of people whose structure, development, or goals drastically conflicts with the way they administer their own group of people, they will leap their own State over the other group of people and attempt to conquer them or at least wilfully destroy their government and 'make them create a new one'.
    this concept is well known with the United States and workers' states, or various Third World countries perceived as not having 'democracy'. but the really interesting thing is you can see it happening with the Soviet Union and Trotskyism.
    it may also be possible that it happens with industrial empires and tribal populations. there is a strange new phenomenon of tribal populations getting weirdly insistent that anarchism is the only correct way of being human and they have the right to break open republics and tell them what to do, which wouldn't even be offensive except that none of the stuff they say actually makes sense. like, to be perfectly honest, I'm really tired of the United States so if you break it up I'm not sure I'd even care, like I want to be out of here and go to another country so it's not really skin off my nose. but what bothers me is they're telling people to urgently do a bunch of garbled nonsense toward no particular goal that nobody could possibly actually succeed at; that's where it gets insulting. I also don't like when theories from tribal populations inside First-World countries seem to infect First World people and possess them to talk more about cracking open Third World countries.
    I feel like there are eventually going to be human rights investigations into whether tribes actually have the right to crack open Third World countries if it would cause them to fall to First World empires and become colonies. because that has absolutely never felt right to me.

Related

Ideology codes

  • MX / meta-Marxism