Jump to content

User:RD/9k/hegemony politics (Q30,52)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
Revision as of 01:09, 12 May 2026 by Reversedragon (talk | contribs) (copy markup from 9k/Q30,52)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Main entry

  1. hegemony politics / musical chairs attack (MDem) / stealth activism (center-Liberalism) -> the motif of people trying to "prevent fascism" by filling up business territories or government institutions with linked groups of people who are "not fascists" as fast as possible before "the fascists" get in. one of the chief strategies of Gramscianism. seems to me like it doesn't really make any sense because it is so chiefly defined by creating countable Cultures of people who belong in a particular cultural identity and carrying out competition between countable Cultures to exist instead of each other existing. that seems a lot more like it's the problem than the way the problem is resolved. realistically, you have to get all your progressives to good landlords and good capitalists who will pay the landlords if you want to end the graph struggle, and put good capitalists in all the reactionary businesses before you can drive the reactionary workers out. the capitalists have to lead this for it to be maximally effective and actually bring change. but it also clearly demonstrates that capitalist populations consist of multiple separate populations divided based on something other than who is a capitalist; you don't have a capitalist population and a worker population, you have specifically a Tory population and a center-Liberal population that recruit people into the nation and "allow" them to work. the bigger question to me is what creates these two populations. it isn't religion, because two people can be Protestants and still divide into these two populations. it has something to do with the inherent collapse of Liberal-republicanism.

Related

  1. hegemonic motif (idea; model; ideology; philosophy) / hegemonic ideology (Western Marxism) / ruling idea (early Marxism) / dominant narrative (postmodernism) -> I wish people would stop saying that Ideas can be dominant when it's always people that dominate and then spit them out.
    it leads to a lot of "Gerson Boom pronounced censored" where people start to believe that all politics and sociology is about constructed narratives and things people deliberately choose to believe and say

Ideologies or fields

  • W / Western Marxism
  • W / Gramscianism

Subpages or related scraps