From Philosophical Research
- [P] (pronounced [P]) "Dirac test"
Characteristics in draft
Properties
- alias (en)
- Is this description or argument unnecessarily opaque for its intended educational level?
- Is this description or argument unnecessarily opaque even to educated people?
- "Dirac test" (communication question 03)
- QID references
- P200 rating / communication rating level
- color swatch references
- quantum mechanics
- Property data type
- item
- instance of
- communication rating level
Prototype notes
- A question for judging videos literally aimed at physics professors. It's possible for a scientific hypothesis to be aimed at a very high level and still be unintelligible to highly educated people who are new to the field.
- Also applies to "ontological spaghetti" where someone like Žižek presents a model that is completely incomprehensible to any human being at first sight.
- Would this description or argument look unnecessarily opaque to a college-educated person? ("Bachelor test")
Usage notes
