Jump to content

Category:Logic in meta-Marxism ontology

From Philosophical Research
Revision as of 13:34, 16 November 2025 by Reversedragon (talk | contribs) (numbers)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This Category contains concepts or statements about the definition of logic and uses of logic within meta-Marxism.

Definitions[edit]

  1. Models of the same object should not contradict each other (proposed; STM)1-1-1
  2. Physical processes can contradict each other (proposed; ML)1-1-1
  3. Materialist models should only contradict each other physically (proposed; MX)1-1-1
  4. When philosophies are true they should only contradict physically (proposed; MX)1-1-1
  5. A statement is false when it logically contradicts a physical process / A statement is false when it improperly contradicts a true material model (proposed; MX)1-1-1

Demonstrations[edit]

  1. Vulpix cannot be both Fire and Water type (proposed; Fy)1-1-1
  2. Papyrus cannot be both Spared and slaughtered (proposed; DFy)1-1-1
  3. Shadow the Hedgehog cannot both save the earth and destroy the earth (proposed; DFy)1-1-1
  4. Today's election can be two results simultaneously (proposed; MX)1-1-1
  5. Tomorrow's election can be two results simultaneously (proposed; MX)1-1-1
  6. A country cannot be both Liberal-republican and Communist (proposed; ML)1-1-1
  7. A country cannot be both mainstream-Marxist-Leninist and Dengist (proposed; ML)1-1-1
  8. A country cannot be both non-Trotskyist and Trotskyist (proposed; IV)1-1-1
  9. A country cannot be both Trotskyist and Tory (proposed; IV)1-1-1
  10. A country cannot be both anarchist and Tory (proposed; A)1-1-1
  11. A country cannot be both social-democratic and Tory (proposed; ES)1-1-1
  12. A country cannot be both gay and Tory (proposed; PT)1-1-1

This category currently contains no pages or media.