Jump to content

Philosophical Research:RatingHub/YT/Miscellaneous

From Philosophical Research

< Philosophical Research:RatingHub

Rating subject: miscellaneous YouTube video channels

This sheet is purely for the purpose of testing the new rating rubric and what questions should be included. It isn't to be taken very seriously.

field, scope, or group [Item]: miscellaneous
overall rating: (N/A)

Rating sheet[edit]

: Hobby shops say it will be game over due to Quebec's language law
rating: NG / Not Good 1-1-1
tests: "Question-begging"/NG; 1

: (claim: Chinese suicide happened for unclear reasons) - China Uncensored (sic)
rating: NG / Not Good 1-1-1
tests: "Object" [fail]; 1

: Arcane Was Always Centrist
rating: NG / Not Good 1-1-1
tests: "Object" [fail]; 1

: Biden's "You Ain't Black" Gaffe: A Logical Breakdown
rating: NG / Not Good 1-1-1
tests: "Question-begging"/NG
"Descartes" [fail]; 2

Earliest tests[edit]

: Indie games are the enemy now (sic ×2)
rating: NG / Not Good 1-1-1
r: 5-18
tests: "Question-begging"/NG; 1

: "Culture as an additional scale of biological organisation"
rating: U / Unknown 1-1-1
r: 5-18
tests: "Scientific" [pass]
"Historical" [pass]
"Dirac" [fail]; 3

: Once You Know This, Every PSYOP Becomes Obvious (sic)
rating: NG / Not Good 1-1-1
r: 5-18
tests: "Figurehead"/NG; 1

: Why the Soviet Union was obsessed with corn
rating: NG / Not Good 1-1-1
r: 5-18
tests: "Historical" [fail]; 1

: Were the Black Panthers tankies?
rating: G / Good 1-1-1
r: 5-17
tests: "Historical" [pass] pronounced [P] "Dirac test" [rating] "Figurehead"/NG "Floyd"/G; 4

: Why were there SO MANY PENGUINS in the 2000s!???
rating: G / Good 1-1-1
r: 5-17
tests: pronounced [P] Scientific consensus test [rating] pronounced [P] Historical accuracy test [rating] "Billboard"; 3

Retrieved from "https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Philosophical_Research:RatingHub/YT/Miscellaneous&oldid=6694"