User:RD/9k/democulturocracy (Q37,77)

Democulture definition[edit]

Democracy is government of the person by the people / Democracy is government of the person, by the people and for the people / culturocracy proposition / democulture proposition (not explaining the component of "democratic" control of culture)
Democracy is government of the culture by the people / Democracy is the people overcoming the Spanishness Office / democulturocracy proposition / democulture proposition (more proper one) / anarculture proposition (one of them) -> culturocracy is a "real" meta-Marxist term, but "democulturocracy proposition" is to be taken as a proper name, not an actual term; even I think that word is too silly.

Kantian ethics and its consequences[edit]

Everyone makes their own meaning (existentialism)
Individual choices immediately shape the health of society / Individual choices immediately contribute to the health of society -> the nexus point where we see Existentialism being born inside the context of ancient religions; what is in my opinion the core of defining "sin", as well as the Buddhist concept of "unhelpful mental factors" that impede meditation and also society.
Do not what others would not "unto" / Nothing should be done unless everybody considers it wonderful / (9k) -> proposition that the Shenlong effect must be expected to physically happen just because one believes in ethics, and one can presume things to be abnormal when it doesn't physically happen
ultimately, believing in ethics doesn't necessarily get everyone out of biases as it's something of a cognitive bias in and of itself.
here, "unto" is being twisted into a verb such the sentence means "Do not what others would not normally-see-happen-as-a-spontaneous-event-unto-them"
Culture is nothing more than the set of signs many individuals spontaneously make up -> this is ultimately why people think there's a "Spanishness Office". Existentialism. they think that if they tell one person, who is perfectly equivalent to the whole population, to change their way of thinking that everybody will spontaneously change, unanimously flipping over the policies of the Spanishness Office. but there are several wrong assumptions in there. one, knowledge doesn't travel faster than light to everybody at once. two, individuals have different content, and whenever they hear the same message, this sorts them into different factions and different opposing courses of action. imagine any two individuals, Stalin and Trotsky, Goku and Vegeta. you tell them the exact same statement, and they take it to mean totally different things, and any allies they have take it to mean the same thing. "Freeza is descending on Planet Vegeta". (if you live on earth, is it a good thing for Saiyans to cease to exist?) "The Soviet Union will fall apart if people don't properly participate". (Trotsky, Zinoviev: that's fantastic!) "Inclusive history education will give marginalized people more power." (Floridians: then let's destroy it, we can't have that.) you have to plan any attempt to "inform everyone" around this inherent separation into ideological subpopulations.
No one should make their own meaning unless others consider it wonderful / People shouldn't spontaneously make up culture and signs unless it's wonderful -> Q3667 + Q?? everyone creates their own meaning = this. anarculture proposition / democulture proposition. I think this one is anarculture but it turns into democulture practically speaking with another proposition
The United States already is democulture / The United States already has democulturocracy -> the claim that the United States actually operates on a system of forcing every single individual to perform a certain list of cultural values at gunpoint, and "democracy" (republican structures) serves only to spread out that basic process of culturocracy over the whole population or at least a selected ruling population of representatives derived from the population.
the corollary, not directly included in this proposition, is that mainstream Marxism-Leninism really is demo-ocracy: government of the physical population of people by the people. a Marxist state truly only wishes to "control" people's bodies while Liberal-republicanism seeks to completely control people's minds and exert authoritarian control over countable cultures and ethnicities that are more closely connected with themselves than with it. in some senses it will always spawn anarchism in response to its strange, incomprehensible methods, because countable cultures fundamentally don't like being culturally controlled like that, White or non-White.

Democulture and exmat[edit]

Culture is the opposite of liberty / Authority isn't the opposite of liberty; the opposite of liberty is culture -> authoritarianism can't exist without culture, in the sense of individuals joining into a larger material object called a countable culture. however, culture can exist without The State and easily perform the same function that The State does. this would be one of the minimum corrections that would make the right-Liberal political compass closer to accurate.
Political positions part populations (bills; policies; divide; split; meta-Marxism) / Whenever a body of people wishes to enforce a particular policy or transformation back onto itself, it will materially divide people into a countable team of people who are loyal to carrying it out and a countable team of people who are against it / (9k)

Ideology codes[edit]

A / anarculture
IK / Kantian ethics
MX onto LR
MX onto ES