Ontology:Q29,49: Difference between revisions
Appearance
copy or update fake Item from Q22,23 |
m data-ident / use HueEntity |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean compound"><li> | {{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean compound"><li value="2949"> <seo title="No True or False answer, to propositions - MX / S2 / Q29,49" /> | ||
<onlyinclude>{{HueEntity|I=S2/MX|Q = 29,49 | PPPA = No proposition has a binary True or False answer | ident = E:NonBinaryLogicProposition }}{{WaveScore|sum=1|quilt=1|ply=1|enddfn=y}}{{#switch: {{{C|}}} | L = <span></span> | Q = [[C:Non-binary truth values ontology]] }}</onlyinclude> | |||
</li></ol><!-- change summary template: copy or update fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN| | </li></ol><!-- change summary template: copy or update fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|Q29,49]] --> __NOTOC__ | ||
== Core characteristics == | == Core characteristics == |
Latest revision as of 11:31, 21 July 2025
- pronounced [MX]No proposition has a binary True or False answer 11 -1 -
Core characteristics[edit]
- item type
- S2 (pronounced C) 11 -1 -
- pronounced [P] label [string] (L)
- pronounced [MX]No proposition has a binary True or False answer 11 -1 -
- E:NonBinaryLogicProposition
- pronounced [P] alias (en) [string]
- No proposition has a binary truth value
- No proposition has a binary True or False value
- Propositions generally should not have a binary True or False value
- The way to fix logic is to replace binary outcomes with sheer tests of consistency
- QID references [Item] 11 -1 -
- --
- sub-case of [Item]
- --
- case of [Item]
- --
- super-case of [Item]
- --
- topic or subject [Item] (TS)
- non-binary truth value
- prototype notes
- you don't fully break out of the Gödel trap this way because practically nothing ever could do that anyway. that part is not what matters. ideally the point of logic isn't to derive facts about reality in a vacuum but instead to perform a basic sanity test of whether statements you already have could possibly be correct or are almost definitely wrong. arguably, that is the thing that logic actually excels at even as it is inappropriate for many other things
Components[edit]
- model combines claims
- --
Use in thesis portals[edit]
- appears in work [Item]
- --
Wavebuilder combinations[edit]
- pronounced [P] pronounced Wavebuilder: forms result [Item]
- --
- along with [Item]
- --