Ontology:Q43,01: Difference between revisions
Appearance
copy or update fake Item from Q4300 Ā |
m Reversedragon moved page Ontology:Q4301 to Ontology:Q43,01: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title Ā |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 09:37, 31 July 2025
Core characteristics[edit]
- pronounced [P] alias (en) [string]
- Why did Trotskyists not consider East Germany to be progress?
- QID references [Item] 11 -1 -
- --
- field, scope, or group [Item]
- pronounced Zā617 pronounced [MX] [Z] meta-Marxism 11 -1 -
- pronounced Zā617 pronounced [IV] [Z] Trotskyism (top-level category) 11 -1 -
- sub-case of [Item]
- --
- super-case of [Item]
- --
Components[edit]
- model combines claims
- --
Use in thesis portals[edit]
- appears in work [Item]
- --
Wavebuilder combinations[edit]
- pronounced [P] pronounced Wavebuilder: forms result [Item]
- --
- along with [Item]
- --
Prototype notes[edit]
- Why did Trotskyists not consider East Germany to be progress? -> you have to think about this a bit to realize that it's a good question. Trotsky wants each country in Europe to overthrow capitalists and create a workers' state. East Germany pushed out capitalists and created a workers' state. if other European countries had each become "East Germany", it would have been one possible route to a union of European socialist republics ā even one independent from the USSR, potentially, given that the USSR stopped occupying East Germany at a certain point. the process of creating East Germany is more or less in line with the mechanism Trotsky proposed for creating Trotskyism. so why were Trotskyists not on board with East Germany?