Ontology:Q43,02

1. [M3]
   East Germany was too small to be Trotskyism 1:(-)1:(-)1

Core characteristics

item type

S2 (C (pronounced C)) 1:(-)1:(-)1

[P] (pronounced [P]) label [string] (L)

[M3]

East Germany was too small to be Trotskyism 1:(-)1:(-)1

E:East Germany was too small to be Trotskyism

[P] (pronounced [P]) alias (en) [string]

Why did Trotskyists not consider East Germany to be progress?

QID references [Item] 1:(-)1:(-)1

--

field, scope, or group [Item]

Z–617 (pronounced Z–617) [MX] [Z] (pronounced [MX] [Z]) meta-Marxism 1:(-)1:(-)1

Z–617 (pronounced Z–617) [IV] [Z] (pronounced [IV] [Z]) Trotskyism (top-level category) 1:(-)1:(-)1

sub-case of [Item]

--

case of [Item]

thought experiment involving East Germany (proposed; MX) 1:(-)1:(-)1

super-case of [Item]

--

Components

model combines claims

--

Use in thesis portals

appears in work [Item]

--

Wavebuilder combinations

[P] (pronounced [P]) Wavebuilder (pronounced Wavebuilder): forms result [Item]

--

along with [Item]

--

forming from [Item]

--

--

--

Prototype notes

4302. East Germany was too small to be Trotskyism -> relatively likely to be the answer you actually get. East Germany small, Trotskyism big. this has never been a satisfying answer to me because it doesn't explain how any group of countries ever gets big enough to form Trotskyism without inevitably forming into unacceptably small "Stalinisms" first.