Jump to content

Term:Republicking: Difference between revisions

From Philosophical Research
prototype notes - first recorded on this page
Usage notes
 
Line 33: Line 33:
   </dl> -->
   </dl> -->


== Prototype notes ==
== Usage notes ==


<ol class="hue clean data_urbanfantasy">
"Republicking" is the concept that a republic is an active process, not a pile of ideas or [[E:Cosmic history is a straight line|a linear time in world history]] — a republic is a population of individuals constantly <em>republicking</em>, which also means they can all <em>fail at republicking</em>, causing the republic to crumble and stop functioning. The connotation of this term is that any particular "attack on [[Term:Our Democracy|democracy]]" does not necessarily come to pass because of malice or conspiracy as much as the fact that republicking [[E:Subjects eat and occupy space|takes energy]] and is never guaranteed to continue. Said another way, should [[E:Q1980|some Lacanian psychoanalyst try to posit]] that Toryism and Bolshevism both represent malicious conspiracies against Liberal-republicanism which each attack the peaceful instance of center-Liberalism out of paranoia, this could conceal a bias against realizing that bashing Bolshevism in such a way could be a case of [[E:center-Liberalism|mainstream Liberal-republicanism]] projecting its own prejudices onto other ideologies whether they also have it or not. Mainstream Liberal-republicanism must suppress other ideologies whether good or bad whenever it becomes paranoid that they might weaken it enough to cause the difficult everyday task of republicking to fail. All of this is because republicking naturally has the ability <em>to</em> fail. Living organisms can die, and republics can stop republicking. Living organisms can die of natural causes, and republics can stop republicking of natural causes as well.
</li><li class="field_mdem" value="618" data-dimension="S">republicking  ->  the concept that a republic is an active process, not a pile of ideas or a linear time in history. a republic <em>is republicking</em>, and the reason a republic comes under attack is that the republic can sometimes <em>fail at republicking</em> — it doesn't specifically happen <em>because</em> anyone spontaneously decides to be malicious, even if such a thing happens.
</li></ol>
 
== Usage notes ==

Latest revision as of 10:29, 11 August 2025

  1. pronounced [L] republicking 1-1-1

Definitions[edit]

  1. The daily activity constantly done by all the non-royal, non-noble individuals in a republic in order for there to exist a republic, which in some cases can cease and cause there not to be a republic.
    represented by form [Form]
    republicking
    language proficiency level or register
    technical term in local research group (proposed; ES) 1-1-1
    field, scope, or group [Item]
    pronounced Z–617 pronounced [MX] [Z] meta-Marxism 1-1-1
    existential materialism
    signifier refers to model
    --
    formed from Lexemes [Sense / Lexeme] (RR)
    --
    synonym
    --
    related or referenced term
    usage example
    --

Forms[edit]

represented by form [Form]
republic
grammatical category
verb (V)
represented by form [Form]
republicking
grammatical category
process noun (VN)

Usage notes[edit]

"Republicking" is the concept that a republic is an active process, not a pile of ideas or a linear time in world history — a republic is a population of individuals constantly republicking, which also means they can all fail at republicking, causing the republic to crumble and stop functioning. The connotation of this term is that any particular "attack on democracy" does not necessarily come to pass because of malice or conspiracy as much as the fact that republicking takes energy and is never guaranteed to continue. Said another way, should some Lacanian psychoanalyst try to posit that Toryism and Bolshevism both represent malicious conspiracies against Liberal-republicanism which each attack the peaceful instance of center-Liberalism out of paranoia, this could conceal a bias against realizing that bashing Bolshevism in such a way could be a case of mainstream Liberal-republicanism projecting its own prejudices onto other ideologies whether they also have it or not. Mainstream Liberal-republicanism must suppress other ideologies whether good or bad whenever it becomes paranoid that they might weaken it enough to cause the difficult everyday task of republicking to fail. All of this is because republicking naturally has the ability to fail. Living organisms can die, and republics can stop republicking. Living organisms can die of natural causes, and republics can stop republicking of natural causes as well.