Jump to content

Philosophical Research:RatingHub/YT/PredictiveHistory: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Philosophical Research
Newer edit →
copy or update rating sheet from YT/communistsofamerica
 
The City That Was Erased From History
Line 5: Line 5:


* This is a channel for public lectures by universities.
* This is a channel for public lectures by universities.
* This channel appears to be using at least part of a Marxist framework, but being primarily focused on specific textbook models of reality, its exact alignment is unclear. The channel <em>claims</em> to be a psychohistory channel.
* This channel uses the framework of psychohistory.
* This channel's content is approximately popular-level.
* This channel's content is approximately popular-level.
<!-- * This channel mentions ??<ref name="unk" /> in the context of relevant theorists or sources. -->
<!-- * This channel mentions ??<ref name="unk" /> in the context of relevant theorists or sources. -->
Line 16: Line 16:
{{HueRoster|P=approximate number of entries| 87 }}
{{HueRoster|P=approximate number of entries| 87 }}
{{HueRoster|P=approximate number of entries| 14 }}
{{HueRoster|P=approximate number of entries| 14 }}
{{HueRoster|P=overall rating| {{U}} }}
{{HueRoster|P=overall rating| {{NG}} }}
</dl>
</dl>


Line 28: Line 28:


<dl class="wikitable hue data_rating">
<dl class="wikitable hue data_rating">
{{WorkRating| {{article|If Money is Infinite, Why Do We Still Have Poverty?}} <ref name="tOm"/> (video 14)  |G={{G}}|RR=6767|Q=1| {{E:P206/G}} }}
{{WorkRating| If Money is Infinite, Why Do We Still Have Poverty? <ref name="tOm"/> (video 14)  |G={{G}}|RR=6767|Q=1| {{E:P206/G}} }}
{{WorkRating| We Need to Bring Back Oral Storytelling. <ref name="pWy"/> (video 13)  |G={{NG}}|RR=6767|Q=2| {{E:P206/NG}} {{E:P207/NG}} }}
{{WorkRating| The City That Was <b class{{=}}"caps">Erased</b> From History <ref name="Isz"/> (video 12)  |G={{NG}}|RR=6767|Q=1| {{E:P202/NG}} }}
</dl>
</dl>


Line 34: Line 36:


<!-- {{HueCSS}} --><ol class="hue clean">
<!-- {{HueCSS}} --><ol class="hue clean">
</li><li {{IS1/ML/class}} value="4221">crisis of capitalism
</li><li {{IS1/ML/class}} value="4221">crisis of capitalism <ref name="tOm"/>
</li><li {{IS2/ES/class}} value="618">Poor people are created to make you work <ref name="tOm"/> -> this is.... kind of correct but a little misleading. you can see the contradiction inside the lecture itself. nobility used money in order to arrange people into a kingdom. into an armored, armed "crab". it's easy to think the key word is "used" and that they're exploiting people and burning everything valuable for their own gain, but the key word is "arrange". in that example money is empowering people to form into societies. in Europe we can bring up how churches weren't <em>entirely</em> malevolent and sometimes they'd take their money and land and do administrative functions; today they run kindergartens. money enables merchants to test out the tiniest experiment in global capitalism before settling back into local small-capitalism because going around the world is hard. but what money is doing there is proving that people can connect one city to another city. the merchants actually succeed on the basis of creating connections. then when they create banks, again the bank is creating the connections between the nobility and the armies or the royal ministries later. with the development of capitalism-proper the local states lose control and the chunks become the businesses, which have to expand to accommodate population growth, but they succeed or fail based on how effectively they link to various other businesses in the world. particular rings of success take slots in society away from people who don't become inherently compatible with strengthening either individual business territories or the arrangement of connections. those are the poor people. so, the reason it's hard to end poverty is all the other individuals are actively working against all the individuals below them. they wouldn't have to be if they could just see the business lattice and realize that everybody has to be fit into it, and if everyone would just get a little smarter about arranging people nobody would have to waste work or arbitrarily take someone else's slot in the structure only to make the world a little worse. at this point they can kick out the capitalists. the issue is, capitalism keeps totally falling apart and leaving people unable to build up the business lattice fast enough to be able to remain united instead of necessarily having to fight each other and the outside "poor people" or Refuse layer.
</li><li {{IS2/ES/class}} value="2883">Poor people are created to make you work <ref name="tOm"/>
</li><li {{IS2/ES/class}} value="618">Wars prolong artificial scarcity / Wars aim to destroy wealth <ref name="tOm"/>  ->  true and also not true?
</li><li {{IF2/ES/class}} value="618">We live within visual culture / We live within visual culture, not literary culture <ref name="pWy"/> ->  no. literary culture as defined in this talk is quite alive, and visual culture is not actually that different from it. practically, whenever anybody tries to comment on or evaluate work meant to be experienced viscerally everyone pounds you to learn academic-style analysis until you're a "proper literary critic" with "media literacy skills". literary culture and visual culture are both largely the product of the bourgeoisie.
</li><li {{IF2/ES/class}} value="618">Prussia started the unification of all of Germany <ref name="Isz" />  ->  now that is a claim.
</li></ol>
</li></ol>


== Additional remarks ==
== Additional remarks ==


* I have a suspicion the clips channel is strategically clipping the channel to make it sound more Marxist than it is. I can't fully check this right now. — <span style="display: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg);" aria-hidden="true" title="tyrannosaur rampant inverted">🦖</span> [[User:Reversedragon|R.D.]] ([[User talk:Reversedragon|talk]]) 08:02, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
* I have a suspicion the clips channel is strategically clipping the channel to make it sound more Marxist than it is. I can't fully check this right now. All I know is that if that's what's going on it's almost working — <span style="display: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg);" aria-hidden="true" title="tyrannosaur rampant inverted">🦖</span> [[User:Reversedragon|R.D.]]
* Commenters tore apart the Konnigsburg video as inaccurate to the history of Prussia. <ref name="Isz"/> I don't truly know if they're correct but given that the only clear agenda in the comment is "Prussia" I'm inclined to believe them


== References ==
== References ==


<references>
<references>
<ref name="pWy">{{article|We Need to Bring Back Oral Storytelling.|YT=4pWyistsvC8}}</ref>
<ref name="tOm">{{article|If Money is Infinite, Why Do We Still Have Poverty?|YT=tOm_aF_SB-k}}</ref>
<ref name="tOm">{{article|If Money is Infinite, Why Do We Still Have Poverty?|YT=tOm_aF_SB-k}}</ref>
<ref name="Isz">{{article|The City That Was <b class{{=}}"caps">Erased</b> From History|YT=IszaCRhid1g}}</ref>
<!-- <ref name="unk">Video unknown.</ref> -->
<!-- <ref name="unk">Video unknown.</ref> -->
</references>
</references>

Revision as of 11:27, 28 August 2025

Background

Rating subject: YouTube video channel pronounced @PredictiveHistory

  • This is a channel for public lectures by universities.
  • This channel uses the framework of psychohistory.
  • This channel's content is approximately popular-level.
pronounced [P] alias (en) [string]
Predictive History
URL
pronounced @PredictiveHistory
pronounced @profjiangclips
field, scope, or group [Item]
psychohistory (proposed; ES) 1-1-1
popular-level material
approximate number of entries
87
approximate number of entries
14
overall rating
NG / Not Good 1-1-1

Rating sheet (main channel)

contained work
--
rating
U / Unknown 1-1-1
tests
--
0

Rating sheet (clips channel)

contained work
If Money is Infinite, Why Do We Still Have Poverty? [1] (video 14)
rating
G / Good 1-1-1
tests
"Object" [pass]
1
contained work
We Need to Bring Back Oral Storytelling. [2] (video 13)
rating
NG / Not Good 1-1-1
tests
"Object" [fail]
"Question-begging" [fail]
2
contained work
The City That Was Erased From History [3] (video 12)
rating
NG / Not Good 1-1-1
tests
"Historical" [fail]
1

Motifs

  1. crisis of capitalism [1]
  2. Poor people are created to make you work [1]
  3. Wars prolong artificial scarcity / Wars aim to destroy wealth [1] -> true and also not true?
  4. We live within visual culture / We live within visual culture, not literary culture [2] -> no. literary culture as defined in this talk is quite alive, and visual culture is not actually that different from it. practically, whenever anybody tries to comment on or evaluate work meant to be experienced viscerally everyone pounds you to learn academic-style analysis until you're a "proper literary critic" with "media literacy skills". literary culture and visual culture are both largely the product of the bourgeoisie.
  5. Prussia started the unification of all of Germany [3] -> now that is a claim.

Additional remarks

  • I have a suspicion the clips channel is strategically clipping the channel to make it sound more Marxist than it is. I can't fully check this right now. All I know is that if that's what's going on it's almost working — R.D.
  • Commenters tore apart the Konnigsburg video as inaccurate to the history of Prussia. [3] I don't truly know if they're correct but given that the only clear agenda in the comment is "Prussia" I'm inclined to believe them

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 If Money is Infinite, Why Do We Still Have Poverty? [1]
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 We Need to Bring Back Oral Storytelling. [2]
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 The City That Was Erased From History [3]
Retrieved from "https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Philosophical_Research:RatingHub/YT/PredictiveHistory&oldid=8506"