Ontology:TsubouchiNetworkingSuccess: Difference between revisions

Newer edit →

Revision as of 22:40, 2 October 2025

The Ripple Effect (Tsubouchi 2025) 1-1-1

Core characteristics

item type: Z (wiki feature; pronounced Category) 1-1-1
pronounced P: label [string] (L): The Ripple Effect (Tsubouchi 2025) 1-1-1; E:TsubouchiNetworkingSuccess
pronounced P: alias (en) [string]: The Ripple Effect: Networking for success (Tsubouchi 2025)
QID references [Item] 1-1-1: --
field, scope, or group [Item]: networking (proposed; ES) 1-1-1
case of [Item]: non-fiction work
URL: --

Bibliographic information

author

David Tsubouchi

title (en)

: The ripple effect: Networking for success

Bibliographic information (2025 paperback)

edition number

advance reading copy

publication date

2025

medium

paperback

page count

: 203

page count

: 216

publisher

Jaguar Book Group

Simon & Schuster

printed in

United States

ISBN

978-1-77852-433-2

Prototype notes

(none)

Motifs

asdfsfsdf

Motifs (subjective)

It should never be easy to quit fast / "Never pronounced redacted quit" -> this is some really interesting advice. hand it to Goku, he'll probably succeed. hand it to a business, it's a real toss-up if will work out. hand it to Deng Xiaoping, he will make China functional for the next century. hand it to Marxist theorists, and if they really truly follow it they'll eventually invent Molecular Marxisms. the question becomes: why is it so acceptable to give up? why do we do that? if we just stopped giving up, and nobody ever "retired" from being a Marxist, where would we be? we have to first declare that making a conscious decision to retreat into your hole and only write books and never come out and do anything else counts as retirement no matter how many books you write. and forming a tiny party whose activities are equivalent to a single individual writing useless books is also retirement. there is at least some teeny tiny step of being proactive above writing books -- I would hypothesize that this minimal step is something like getting all the world's theorists to actually engage in peer review and build up consensuses and start really slamming bogus books that can't somehow be substantiated as a legitimate choice of named Marxism per country characteristics, to the point that "revisionism" is genuinely not a bunch of local opinions and the whole world agrees on a concept of "pseudo-Marxism" in the same sense as "pseudoscience". to the point that Trotskyists recognize revisionism in mainstream Marxism-Leninism, and mainstream Marxist-Leninists recognize revisionism in Trotskyism and they each try to push each other to be better at realizing each other's particular named-Marxism-specific country characteristics toward the end of closing the gap between different Marxisms and creating some kind of singular or plural unity of Marxisms.
we have to first acknowledge that under these conditions there are barriers to leaving retirement. society in general is ruled by various Filaments, as unintentionally explained by this book, so it is always hard to pierce through them, because the Filaments will always be like "human human best-human authentic connection community friendship friendship relationship", the only shovel dream they can generate, even as the very same Filaments can easily bake in ignorance and oppression and toxic positivity and these super arbitrary definitions of who is "really" an ideal member of a particular fanbase or workplace or charity to where society becomes divided into a sea of "real humans" who get into Networks specifically by humaning better and a sea of "garbage humans" who are rejected as human for reasons far more arbitrary than any of the Filament wants to admit. the threat of "systemic problems" is always concealed in the state of "fun, happy Community" where they are not yet apparent, which is what truly entrenches all the bad stuff once it turns up; toxic systems emerge directly from sociality itself and people's desire to have friends or very hard-won connections that got them into a position over years and years and years, and their inability to let go of Progress On Building Community. in industrial societies Communism is always stuck fighting against sociality, as people are much more greatly connected by a spiderweb of arbitrary individual relationships than by any actual class subpopulation or even any named oppression. every attempt to organize people tears at the blue spiderweb and even by regular people will sometimes be perceived as an attack. at the same time, sociality leads people to some really dumb things, like thinking that being in a protest one day or one month will already have changed the next five to ten years. this is the "opening" or "crisis" that Trotskyists and Western-Marxists keep coveting. it isn't simply the inability to see the power of the bourgeoisie, it's the inability to realize society runs on networkisms and for a movement to truly survive that you have to throw the whole rest of your life and entire existence into each year potentially building some named Marxism of the future, and more than that, you can't just get killed in a conflict and significant numbers of theorists have to actually survive. permanent revolution has become permanent cold-war. we're looking at something more like whole seas of people informally seceding and building central party-nations that actually are forced to exist alongside islands of capitalism in the same country, and their success is truly based on whether they out-survive the blue islands and thus get people kicked out of the blue islands into nothingness to join the red islands. that's looking at it as Marxism-Dengism. some might find Marxism-Trotskyism more fun, because they can build red Lattices around the blue islands joining each region of Lattices across the world at whatever speed and do something more similar to traditional Leninist party activity. the only catch is that they have to be smart enough to realize that socialism in one country is an inevitable stage within Trotskyist transition if only at the level of creating the central party of each country-region and making it truly effective to the point it becomes okay to think bigger.

Wavebuilder combinations

pronounced P: pronounced Wave-builder: forms result [Item]

: --
along with [Item]: The Ripple Effect (Tsubouchi 2025) 1-1-1
forming from [Item]: The Ripple Effect (Tsubouchi 2025) 1-1-1; --; --

Wavebuilder characterizations

pronounced Wave-builder: route [Item]

: The Ripple Effect (Tsubouchi 2025) 1-1-1
along with [Item]: --
forming from [Item]: --; --; The Ripple Effect (Tsubouchi 2025) 1-1-1