Jump to content

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q86: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
14,455 edits
copy markup from 9k/Q86
 
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
14,455 edits
m class is a single substrate
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


{{li|start=y|I=S1/MX|Q=86|Q2=86|h4 = existential materialism }} / exmat
{{li|start=y|I=S1/MX|Q=86|Q2=86|h4 = existential materialism }} / exmat
</li></ol>
== Class monism ==
<ol class="hue clean terse">
{{li|start=y|I=S2/MX|Q=14,81|Q2=1481|h4= Class is a single substrate }} / The [[E:substance pluralism|substance dualism]] advanced by early Marxism is not fully accurate because its dual substances, the proletariat and the bourgeoisie, operate under substance monism internally / Social darwinism and class society are a monistic process / ([[EC:9k/RD/Q14,80|9k]])
{{li|I=S2/MX|Q=618|Q2=618}}Liberal-republicanism starts as a non-hierarchical one-class society and separates over time / Existentialism begins as a non-hierarchical society with one class and separates into two classes over time  ->  I am so close to logically proving that, on account of [[E:stationary combination of heterogeneous elements|stationary combinations of heterogeneous elements]] and [[E:molecularization (meta-Marxism)|molecularization]], capitalism is anarchic regardless of how anarchists want to define "anarchy", and there is no meaningful distinction that makes [[E:anhierarchy (meta-Marxism onto anarchism)|anhierarchy]] part of a strictly different category of things than anarchy


</li></ol>
</li></ol>
Line 10: Line 19:
<ol class="hue clean terse">
<ol class="hue clean terse">


{{li|I=Z1/ML|tradition=ML|Q=83|Q2=83|h4 = dialectical materialism }} / diamat
{{li|start=y|I=Z1/ML|tradition=ML|Q=83|Q2=83|h4 = dialectical materialism }} / diamat


{{li|I=Z1/ML|tradition=ML|Q=84|Q2=84|h4 = [[E:historical materialism|historical materialism]] }} (specific-sense) / histmat
{{li|I=Z1/ML|tradition=ML|Q=84|Q2=84|h4 = [[E:historical materialism|historical materialism]] }} (specific-sense) / histmat

Latest revision as of 05:03, 1 May 2026

Main entry

  1. existential materialism

    / exmat

Class monism

  1. Class is a single substrate

    / The substance dualism advanced by early Marxism is not fully accurate because its dual substances, the proletariat and the bourgeoisie, operate under substance monism internally / Social darwinism and class society are a monistic process / (9k)
  2. Liberal-republicanism starts as a non-hierarchical one-class society and separates over time / Existentialism begins as a non-hierarchical society with one class and separates into two classes over time -> I am so close to logically proving that, on account of stationary combinations of heterogeneous elements and molecularization, capitalism is anarchic regardless of how anarchists want to define "anarchy", and there is no meaningful distinction that makes anhierarchy part of a strictly different category of things than anarchy

Related

  1. dialectical materialism

    / diamat

  2. historical materialism

    (specific-sense) / histmat

  3. argument for general-sense historical materialism

    / (9k)

Ideologies or fields

  • (none)
Retrieved from "https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Ontology_talk:9k/RD/Q86&oldid=42656"