Philosophical Research:RatingHub/YT/communistsofamerica: Difference between revisions
revisit last two ratings |
m →Motifs: use classname templates |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__FORCETOC__ <h2 class="toc-only">Background</h2> | |||
Rating subject: YouTube video channel <strong>[https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/channel/UCQDM1X2hJY95rDb4IU-Jo_w @communistsofamerica]</strong><!-- | Rating subject: YouTube video channel <strong>[https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/channel/UCQDM1X2hJY95rDb4IU-Jo_w @communistsofamerica]</strong><!-- | ||
note: the link is here for immediate use during each edit, as a simpler page that loads fast. it might not work. if it doesn't, replace it with a new invidious link. --> | note: the link is here for immediate use during each edit, as a simpler page that loads fast. it might not work. if it doesn't, replace it with a new invidious link. --> | ||
* This is a Trotskyist theory channel. | * This is a Trotskyist theory channel. | ||
* | * This channel's content is somewhere between popular level and academic level in difficulty. | ||
* This channel attempts to analyze recent history in the sense of "the past 2-10 years" without fixating on weekly news events. It may be choosing to analyze history through models or hypotheses specific to Trotskyism, and | * This channel attempts to analyze recent history in the sense of "the past 2-10 years" without fixating on weekly news events. It may be choosing to analyze history through models or hypotheses specific to Trotskyism, and as such should be rated for its ability to coherently explain a hypothetical Trotskyist future and the practical steps to get there rather than for its adherence to any particular [[E:mainstream Marxism-Leninism|mainstream Marxist-Leninist]] models. This does not absolve it from problems such as historical inaccuracies or inaccuracies to real-world observations. | ||
* This channel mentions "Ted Grant" in the context of relevant theorists or sources. | * This channel mentions "Ted Grant"<ref name="unk" /> in the context of relevant theorists or sources. | ||
{{HueCSS}} | {{HueCSS}} | ||
<dl class="wikitable hue"> | <dl class="wikitable hue"> | ||
{{HueRoster| | {{HueRoster|EP=PPPA| Revolutionary Communists of America }} | ||
{{HueRoster| | {{HueRoster|EP=P34| {{E:Q4104}} | academic-level material | popular-level material }} <!-- en: field Trotskyism --> | ||
{{HueRoster|P=approximate number of entries| | {{HueRoster|P=approximate number of entries| 183 }} | ||
{{HueRoster|P=overall rating| {{U}} }} | {{HueRoster|P=overall rating| {{U}} }} | ||
</dl> | </dl> | ||
| Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
<dl class="wikitable hue data_rating"> | <dl class="wikitable hue data_rating"> | ||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|YqW8CXpVhNY|World Capitalism Is Collapsing (Marx was Right)}} (video 170) |G={{U}}|RR=4997|Q=4| {{ | {{WorkRating| {{YouTube|--|What Does the Zohran Win Mean?}} (video 178) |G={{U}}|RR=4997|Q=0| -- }} | ||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|snXx83r0SDs|Where is America Going?}} (video 169) | {{WorkRating| {{YouTube|--|Why Did Trump Bomb Iran?}} (video 177) |G={{U}}|RR=4997|Q=0| -- }} | ||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|FZ4T7tQoD8Q|How to Stop the ICE Attacks}} (video 168) |G={{U}}|RR=9999|Q=0| -- }} | {{WorkRating| {{YouTube|--|Trump's Iran War Backfires & Zohran Wins Democratic Primary}} (video 176) |G={{U}}|RR=4997|Q=0| -- }} | ||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|bMV0_SAfTuc|Trump isn't a Fascist — Here's Why}} (video 167) |G={{NG}}|RR=4997|Q=4| {{ | {{WorkRating| {{YouTube|--|How Capitalism Has Failed Us}} (video 175) |G={{U}}|RR=4997|Q=0| -- }} | ||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|--|Here's why the U.S. economy is in trouble}} (video 174) |G={{U}}|RR=4997|Q=0| -- }} | |||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|--|How To Have a Revolution in the U.S. — The Leninist Way}} (video 173) |G={{U}}|RR=4997|Q=0| -- }} | |||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|--|The American Dream Is Dead – Here's What Happens Next}} (video 172) |G={{U}}|RR=4997|Q=0| -- }} | |||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|--|Liberals Have It Wrong – Class Struggle Is Coming}} (video 171) |G={{U}}|RR=4997|Q=0| -- }} | |||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|YqW8CXpVhNY|World Capitalism Is Collapsing (Marx was Right)}} (video 170) |G={{U}}|RR=4997|Q=4| {{E:P202}} {{E:P203}} {{E:P206/G}} {{E:P207/NG}} }} | |||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|snXx83r0SDs|Where is America Going?}} (video 169) |G={{U}}|RR=9999|Q=0| -- }} | |||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|FZ4T7tQoD8Q|How to Stop the ICE Attacks}} (video 168) |G={{U}}|RR=9999|Q=0| -- }} | |||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|bMV0_SAfTuc|Trump isn't a Fascist — Here's Why}} (video 167) |G={{NG}}|RR=4997|Q=4| {{E:P202/NG}} {{E:P206/G}} {{E:P207/NG}} {{E:P214/NG}} }} | |||
</dl> | </dl> | ||
== | == Motifs == | ||
<!-- {{HueCSS}} --><ol class="hue clean"> | |||
</li><li {{IS1/IV/class}} value="618">proletarian Bonapartism <ref name="unk" /> -> What is this? Does it even exist? - Fails [[Ontology:P214|Sunny test]]. | |||
</li><li {{IS2/IV/class}} value="618">During the India-Pakistan conflict the Communist Party of India supported the bourgeoisie {{YouTube|YqW8CXpVhNY}} -> I have no clue whether this is true but I have to doubt it. I think we've got a clash between Trotskyism and Maoism here? <ref name="unk" /> | |||
</li><li {{IS2/IV/class}} value="618">The United States wanted to break up Russia / The United States wanted to break up Russia because it was too big as a countable Culture and thus overpowered in global conflicts -> this is a terrible thought but I'd believe it. the United States does some very messed-up things. <ref name="unk" /> | |||
</li><li {{IS2/IV/class}} value="618">The U.S. petty-bourgeois layer has been whittled down substantially <ref name="bm-c" /> -> dubious. Ignores the role of geography in creating local Artisanal cesspools and disconnecting "consolidated" corporations in far-off cities from actual geographical settlements. Fails [[E:P207|question-begging test]]. | |||
</li></ol> | |||
== Additional remarks == | |||
== | * Descriptions of world economic history were confusing and difficult to verify or falsify. At the same time, talk brought up an interesting point about countries chunk-competing over the world consumer base. <ref name="yq-y" /> | ||
* Recent talks did an excellent job of portraying Trotskyist theories of populations as composed of material objects. <ref name="bm-c" /> | |||
== References == | |||
( | <references> | ||
<ref name="yq-y"><cite class="article">World Capitalism Is Collapsing (Marx was Right)</cite> {{YouTube|YqW8CXpVhNY}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="bm-c"><cite class="article">Trump isn't a Fascist — Here's Why</cite> {{YouTube|bMV0_SAfTuc}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="unk">Video unknown.</ref> | |||
</references> | |||
[[Category:Source communication rating sheets]]<!-- | [[Category:Source communication rating sheets]]<!-- | ||
duplication hint: copy or update rating sheet from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|YT/communistsofamerica]] --> | duplication hint: copy or update rating sheet from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|YT/communistsofamerica]] --> | ||
Latest revision as of 08:35, 25 July 2025
Background
Rating subject: YouTube video channel @communistsofamerica
- This is a Trotskyist theory channel.
- This channel's content is somewhere between popular level and academic level in difficulty.
- This channel attempts to analyze recent history in the sense of "the past 2-10 years" without fixating on weekly news events. It may be choosing to analyze history through models or hypotheses specific to Trotskyism, and as such should be rated for its ability to coherently explain a hypothetical Trotskyist future and the practical steps to get there rather than for its adherence to any particular mainstream Marxist-Leninist models. This does not absolve it from problems such as historical inaccuracies or inaccuracies to real-world observations.
- This channel mentions "Ted Grant"[1] in the context of relevant theorists or sources.
- pronounced [P] alias (mis) [string]
- Revolutionary Communists of America
- field, scope, or group [Item]
- pronounced Z–617 pronounced [IV] [Z] Trotskyism (top-level category) 1-1-1
- academic-level material
- popular-level material
- approximate number of entries
- 183
Rating sheet[edit]
Motifs[edit]
- proletarian Bonapartism [1] -> What is this? Does it even exist? - Fails Sunny test.
- During the India-Pakistan conflict the Communist Party of India supported the bourgeoisie [3] -> I have no clue whether this is true but I have to doubt it. I think we've got a clash between Trotskyism and Maoism here? [1]
- The United States wanted to break up Russia / The United States wanted to break up Russia because it was too big as a countable Culture and thus overpowered in global conflicts -> this is a terrible thought but I'd believe it. the United States does some very messed-up things. [1]
- The U.S. petty-bourgeois layer has been whittled down substantially [2] -> dubious. Ignores the role of geography in creating local Artisanal cesspools and disconnecting "consolidated" corporations in far-off cities from actual geographical settlements. Fails question-begging test.
Additional remarks[edit]
- Descriptions of world economic history were confusing and difficult to verify or falsify. At the same time, talk brought up an interesting point about countries chunk-competing over the world consumer base. [3]
- Recent talks did an excellent job of portraying Trotskyist theories of populations as composed of material objects. [2]