Jump to content

Ontology:Q29,49: Difference between revisions

From Philosophical Research
m Reversedragon moved page Ontology:Q2949 to Ontology:Q29,49: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title
m formatting
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean compound"><li>
{{ArticleTitle|[S2] No True or False answer to propositions - MX / S2 / Q29,49|NoContents=y}}
<onlyinclude><dfn class="field_mdem manual" data-dimension="S2" data-qid="29,49" data-numbersign="404" data-field="" data-series="" data-work="" data-chapter="" data-tale="" data-object="" data-note="" data-lexeme="">{{IS2}}{{#if: {{{1|}}} | [[E:Q2949|{{{1}}}]] | [[E:Q2949|No proposition has a binary True or False answer]] }}{{WaveScore|sum=1|quilt=1|ply=1}}</dfn>{{#switch: {{{C|}}} | L = <span></span> | Q = [[C:Non-binary truth values ontology]] }}</onlyinclude> __NOTOC__
<includeonly><onlyinclude>{{HueEntity|I=S2/MX|Q=29,49|sum=1|quilt=1|ply=1 <!-- three braces: changeable arguments -->
</li></ol><!-- change summary template:  copy or update fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|Q2949]] -->
|swatch={{{class|field_mdem}}}|class=manual flag|lang={{{lang|en}}}|PPPA2={{{1|}}}|sense={{{2|}}}|ins={{{3|}}}|area={{{area|}}}|field={{{field|}}}|area-free={{{area-free|}}}
| PPPA = {{label|{{{lang|}}}
  | en  = No proposition has a binary True or False answer }}
|numbersign = 404 |enddfn=1}}{{#switch: {{{C|}}} | L = [[C:meta-Marxist terms]] | Q = [[C:meta-Marxism ontology]] }}</onlyinclude></includeonly>{{ArticleTitle|meta-Marxism - MX / Z1 / Q92|NoContents=y}}{{HueNumberPreview|E=Q29,49}}<!--
duplication hint:  copy or update fake Item from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|Q29,49]] -->


== Core characteristics ==
== Core characteristics ==
Line 7: Line 11:
<dl class="wikitable hue">
<dl class="wikitable hue">
{{HueClaim |P=item type| {{Template:S2}} }}
{{HueClaim |P=item type| {{Template:S2}} }}
{{HueRoster|EP=PPPA/L|lang=en| {{E:Q2949}} | [[E:NonBinaryLogicProposition]] }}
{{HueRoster|EP=PPPA/L|lang=en| {{E:Q29,49}} | [[E:NonBinaryLogicProposition]] }}
{{HueClaim |EP=PPPA|lang=en| No proposition has a binary truth value | No proposition has a binary True or False value | Propositions generally should not have a binary True or False value | The way to fix logic is to replace binary outcomes with sheer tests of consistency }}
{{HueClaim |EP=PPPA|lang=en| No proposition has a binary truth value | No proposition has a binary True or False value | Propositions generally should not have a binary True or False value | The way to fix logic is to replace binary outcomes with sheer tests of consistency | Any decision to represent the truth value of a proposition as neatly true or neatly false is a subjective choice to discard information }}
{{HueRoster|EP=P42| -- }}  <!-- en: QID references -->
{{HueRoster|EP=P42| -- }}  <!-- en: QID references -->
{{HueRoster|EP=P34| {{E:Q618/MX|non-binary logic}} }}  <!-- en: color swatch references -->
{{HueRoster|EP=P34| {{E:Q618/MX|non-binary logic}} }}  <!-- en: color swatch references -->
Line 14: Line 18:
{{HueRoster|EP=P4| -- }}  <!-- en: case of -->
{{HueRoster|EP=P4| -- }}  <!-- en: case of -->
{{HueRoster|EP=P5| -- }}  <!-- en: super-case of -->
{{HueRoster|EP=P5| -- }}  <!-- en: super-case of -->
{{HueRoster|EP=P35/TS| non-binary truth value [[Category:Non-binary truth values ontology]] }}  <!-- en: subject or topic -->
{{HueRoster|EP=P35/TS| {{E:Q530/UU|C=Q}} }}  <!-- en: subject or topic non-binary truth value -->
{{HueRoster|P=[[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand|prototype]] notes| you don't fully break out of the Gödel trap this way because practically nothing ever could do that anyway. that part is not what matters. ideally the point of logic isn't to derive facts about reality in a vacuum but instead to perform a basic sanity test of whether statements you already have could possibly be correct or are almost definitely wrong. arguably, that is the thing that logic actually excels at even as it is inappropriate for many other things }}
{{HueRoster|P=[[User:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand|prototype]] notes| you don't fully break out of the Gödel trap this way because practically nothing ever could do that anyway. that part is not what matters. ideally the point of logic isn't to derive facts about reality in a vacuum but instead to perform a basic sanity test of whether statements you already have could possibly be correct or are almost definitely wrong. arguably, that is the thing that logic actually excels at even as it is inappropriate for many other things }}
</dl>
</dl>
Line 33: Line 37:


<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild three">   
<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild three">   
{{WaveBuildNone| -- | -- | -- }}  <!-- en: WITH ?? PRODUCES ?? -->
{{WaveBuildNone| {{E:Q29,49}} | -- | -- }}  <!-- en: Along With, Produces  ??  ?? -->
</dl>
 
=== Wavebuilder characterizations ===
 
<dl class="wikitable hue data_wavebuild three"> 
{{WaveRoute| -- | -- | {{E:Q29,49}} }}  <!-- en: Along With, Produces ??  ?? -->
</dl>
</dl>


== Usage notes ==
== Usage notes ==

Latest revision as of 06:28, 9 March 2026

  1. pronounced . (S2)pronounced (meta-) (S2): No proposition has a binary True or False answer1-1-1

Core characteristics[edit]

pronounced P: label (en) [string] (L)
pronounced . (S2)pronounced (meta-) (S2): No proposition has a binary True or False answer1-1-1
E:NonBinaryLogicProposition
pronounced P: alias (en) [string]
No proposition has a binary truth value
No proposition has a binary True or False value
Propositions generally should not have a binary True or False value
The way to fix logic is to replace binary outcomes with sheer tests of consistency
Any decision to represent the truth value of a proposition as neatly true or neatly false is a subjective choice to discard information
sub-case of [Item]
--
case of [Item]
--
super-case of [Item]
--
topic or subject [Item] (TS)
pronounced S0: non-binary truth value (logic) (UU)1-1-1
prototype notes
you don't fully break out of the Gödel trap this way because practically nothing ever could do that anyway. that part is not what matters. ideally the point of logic isn't to derive facts about reality in a vacuum but instead to perform a basic sanity test of whether statements you already have could possibly be correct or are almost definitely wrong. arguably, that is the thing that logic actually excels at even as it is inappropriate for many other things

Components[edit]

model combines claims
--

Use in thesis portals[edit]

appears in work [Item]
--

Wavebuilder combinations[edit]

pronounced P: pronounced Wave-builder: forms result [Item]
--
along with [Item]
pronounced . (S2)pronounced (meta-) (S2): No proposition has a binary True or False answer1-1-1
forming from [Item]
pronounced . (S2)pronounced (meta-) (S2): No proposition has a binary True or False answer1-1-1
--
--

Wavebuilder characterizations[edit]

pronounced Wave-builder: route [Item]
pronounced . (S2)pronounced (meta-) (S2): No proposition has a binary True or False answer1-1-1
along with [Item]
--
forming from [Item]
--
--
pronounced . (S2)pronounced (meta-) (S2): No proposition has a binary True or False answer1-1-1

Usage notes[edit]