Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q4000: Difference between revisions
Stalinism is a Thermidorian negation |
m Trotskyism is over |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{li|I=S2/IV|tradition=|Q=41,84|Q2=4184|h4= Stalinism is a Thermidorian negation }} / Stalinists were Soviet Thermidor / Stalinism begins when older forms of society crush the proletarian revolution (Trotskyism) / Stalinism is a Thermidorian negation of Bolshevism; this is to imply it is similar to when the Jacobins were defeated in the French Revolution [https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2008/10/stal-o20.html] | {{li|I=S2/IV|tradition=|Q=41,84|Q2=4184|h4= Stalinism is a Thermidorian negation }} / Stalinists were Soviet Thermidor / Stalinism begins when older forms of society crush the proletarian revolution (Trotskyism) / Stalinism is a Thermidorian negation of Bolshevism; this is to imply it is similar to when the Jacobins were defeated in the French Revolution [https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2008/10/stal-o20.html] | ||
{{li|I=S2/IV|tradition=|Q=49,90|Q2=4990|h4=}}Stalin's Marxism is over <!-- / Stalin Thought is over --> -> [old] <s>had some vanishing chance of being true in 1940, not very believable these days</s> | |||
{{li|I=F2/ML|tradition=|Q=49,91|Q2=4991|h4=}}[[E:Q4991|Trotskyism is over]] -> [old] <s>why is it that all Trotskyists refuse to believe this while most or all mainstream Marxist-Leninists believe it and about half of all center-Liberals and Existentialists believe it? this should be less controversial than "Bolshevism is over". if Trotskyism isn't materially possible but mainstream Marxism-Leninism is, you'd think that nearly everyone would be unanimous about the first part of that, because advocating for Trotskyism isn't advantageous to either Existentialists or mainstream Marxist-Leninists.</s> | |||
{{li|I=F2/ML|tradition=|Q=49,91|Q2=4991|h4=}}[[E:Q4991|Trotskyism is over]] -> so........ it's not. successful or unsuccessful, it's less dead than Stalinist parties. | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
| Line 25: | Line 31: | ||
{{li|start=y | {{li|start=y | ||
|I=Z1/IV |Q=41,04|Q2=4104}}{{TTS|IV|Fourth}} / Trotskyism | |I=Z1/IV |Q=41,04|Q2=4104}}{{TTS|IV|Fourth}} / Trotskyism | ||
{{li|I=Z1/ML |Q=41,03|Q2=4103}}{{TTS|ML|M-L}} / Stalin's Marxism | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
Revision as of 10:52, 13 August 2026
Main entries
Bolshevik-Leninism
/ Leninism (Trotsky's definition) / Marxist theories used by the original Bolsheviks (Trotskyism) -> use to mark highly specific definitions of "Leninism" in Trotskyist texts. all Trotskyist definitions of Leninism are this, and all non-Trotskyist definitions are not.
Stalin's Marxism isn't Leninism
Stalin's Marxism isn't Leninism
/ He calls it Marxism-Leninism, but it isn't really Leninism / Stalin's "Marxism" isn't a Marxist tendency; it is something other than Marxism (sense) / (9k)Stalinism is a Thermidorian negation
/ Stalinists were Soviet Thermidor / Stalinism begins when older forms of society crush the proletarian revolution (Trotskyism) / Stalinism is a Thermidorian negation of Bolshevism; this is to imply it is similar to when the Jacobins were defeated in the French Revolution [1]- Stalin's Marxism is over -> [old]
had some vanishing chance of being true in 1940, not very believable these days - Trotskyism is over -> [old]
why is it that all Trotskyists refuse to believe this while most or all mainstream Marxist-Leninists believe it and about half of all center-Liberals and Existentialists believe it? this should be less controversial than "Bolshevism is over". if Trotskyism isn't materially possible but mainstream Marxism-Leninism is, you'd think that nearly everyone would be unanimous about the first part of that, because advocating for Trotskyism isn't advantageous to either Existentialists or mainstream Marxist-Leninists. - Trotskyism is over -> so........ it's not. successful or unsuccessful, it's less dead than Stalinist parties.
Related
Ideology codes
- / Trotskyism
- / Stalin's Marxism