Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q19,80: Difference between revisions
Appearance
copy markup from Q12,9,44 |
Unpredictable equals undetermined |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Main entry == | == Main entry == | ||
{{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"> | {{HueCSS}}<ol class="hue clean"> | ||
{{li|start=y|I=Z1/ES|tradition=|Q=19,80|Q2=1980|h4-rem=}}{{book|E=Q19,80|The Excessive Subject: A new theory of social change}} (Rothenberg 2010) | |||
</li></ol> | |||
== You can't predict the economy! == | |||
<ol class="hue clean"> | |||
{{li|start=y|I=S2/LR|Q=618|Q2=618|h4-rem=}}Unpredictable equals undetermined / A proper economic theory must respect the idea that the rules of the undetermined are themselves undetermined (Yanis Varoufakis) / Scientific knowledge of the workings of the capitalist economy and the development of a practice based on that knowledge are impossible (WSWS onto Varoufakis) [https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/02/28/varo-f28.html] -> shut the {{censor|fuck}} up rothenberg. I know you're not Rothenberg but that's your name now if you go around saying stuff like that.<br/> | |||
ok, on the bright side though, if this is true, a proper theory of economics has to just accept that Communist revolution happened in another country purely because you couldn't control it. most of what happens in a Communist revolution isn't engineered by Stalin or Mao, so it's undetermined, right? and that means you can't place rules on whether it will happen or not. I bet you love that outcome. | |||
{{li|I=F2/STM|Q=618|Q2=618|h4-rem=}}Unpredictable equals undetermined -> then how does anything {{censor|fucking}} happen??? this man should semi-literally be handed an "F" in physics | |||
</li></ol> | </li></ol> | ||
Revision as of 08:25, 13 August 2026
Main entry
- The Excessive Subject: A new theory of social change (Rothenberg 2010)
You can't predict the economy!
- Unpredictable equals undetermined / A proper economic theory must respect the idea that the rules of the undetermined are themselves undetermined (Yanis Varoufakis) / Scientific knowledge of the workings of the capitalist economy and the development of a practice based on that knowledge are impossible (WSWS onto Varoufakis) [1] -> shut the
up rothenberg. I know you're not Rothenberg but that's your name now if you go around saying stuff like that.
ok, on the bright side though, if this is true, a proper theory of economics has to just accept that Communist revolution happened in another country purely because you couldn't control it. most of what happens in a Communist revolution isn't engineered by Stalin or Mao, so it's undetermined, right? and that means you can't place rules on whether it will happen or not. I bet you love that outcome. - Unpredictable equals undetermined -> then how does anything
happen??? this man should semi-literally be handed an "F" in physics
Related
Ideologies or fields
- ES / political agorism
- MX / meta-Marxism