Philosophical Research:RatingHub/YT/communistsofamerica: Difference between revisions
copy or update rating sheet from YT/daemonsultanump; two ratings |
revisit last two ratings |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
<dl class="wikitable hue data_rating"> | <dl class="wikitable hue data_rating"> | ||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|YqW8CXpVhNY|World Capitalism Is Collapsing (Marx was Right)}} (video 170) |G={{U}}|RR=4997|Q= | {{WorkRating| {{YouTube|YqW8CXpVhNY|World Capitalism Is Collapsing (Marx was Right)}} (video 170) |G={{U}}|RR=4997|Q=4| {{Ontology:P202}} {{Ontology:P203}} {{Ontology:P206/G}} {{Ontology:P207/NG}} }} | ||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|snXx83r0SDs|Where is America Going?}} (video 169) |G={{U}}|RR=9999|Q=0| -- }} | {{WorkRating| {{YouTube|snXx83r0SDs|Where is America Going?}} (video 169) |G={{U}}|RR=9999|Q=0| -- }} | ||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|FZ4T7tQoD8Q|How to Stop the ICE Attacks}} (video 168) |G={{U}}|RR=9999|Q=0| -- }} | {{WorkRating| {{YouTube|FZ4T7tQoD8Q|How to Stop the ICE Attacks}} (video 168) |G={{U}}|RR=9999|Q=0| -- }} | ||
{{WorkRating| {{YouTube|bMV0_SAfTuc|Trump isn't a Fascist — Here's Why}} (video 167) |G={{NG}}|RR=4997|Q= | {{WorkRating| {{YouTube|bMV0_SAfTuc|Trump isn't a Fascist — Here's Why}} (video 167) |G={{NG}}|RR=4997|Q=4| {{Ontology:P202/NG}} {{Ontology:P206/G}} {{Ontology:P207/NG}} {{Ontology:P214/NG}} }} | ||
</dl> | </dl> | ||
== Remarks == | |||
* "proletarian Bonapartism" - What is this? Does it even exist? - Fails [[Ontology:P214|Sunny test]]. | |||
* "The [US] petty-bourgeois layer has been whittled down substantially" {{YouTube|bMV0_SAfTuc}} - Ignores the role of geography in creating local Artisanal cesspools and disconnecting "consolidated" corporations from actual geographical settlements. Fails [[Ontology:P207|question-begging test]]. | |||
* Descriptions of world economic history were confusing and difficult to verify or falsify. At the same time, talk brought up an interesting point about countries chunk-competing over the world consumer base. {{YouTube|YqW8CXpVhNY}} | |||
* Recent talks did an excellent job of portraying Trotskyist theories of populations as composed of material objects. {{YouTube|bMV0_SAfTuc}} | |||
== Motifs == | |||
* [IV] [S] proletarian Bonapartism | |||
* [IV] [S2] During the India-Pakistan conflict the Communist Party of India supported the bourgeoisie {{YouTube|YqW8CXpVhNY}} -> I have no clue whether this is true but I have to doubt it. I think we've got a clash between Trotskyism and Maoism here? | |||
* [S2] The United States wanted to break up Russia {{YouTube|YqW8CXpVhNY}} | |||
(Put a [[:Category:Fake Item lists|number list]] here when appropriate) | |||
[[Category:Source communication rating sheets]]<!-- | [[Category:Source communication rating sheets]]<!-- | ||
copy or update rating sheet from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|YT/communistsofamerica]] --> | duplication hint: copy or update rating sheet from [[Special:PermanentLink/NNNN|YT/communistsofamerica]] --> | ||
Revision as of 11:02, 19 June 2025
Rating subject: YouTube video channel @communistsofamerica
- This is a Trotskyist theory channel.
- The content is somewhere between popular level and academic level in difficulty.
- This channel attempts to analyze recent history in the sense of "the past 2-10 years" without fixating on weekly news events. It may be choosing to analyze history through models or hypotheses specific to Trotskyism, and must be rated accordingly. This does not absolve it from problems such as historical inaccuracies.
- This channel mentions "Ted Grant" in the context of relevant theorists or sources.
- pronounced [P] alias (mis) [string]
- Revolutionary Communists of America
- field, scope, or group [Item]
- pronounced Z–617 pronounced [IV] [Z] Trotskyism (top-level category) 1-1-1
- approximate number of entries
- 170
Rating sheet
Remarks
- "proletarian Bonapartism" - What is this? Does it even exist? - Fails Sunny test.
- "The [US] petty-bourgeois layer has been whittled down substantially" [1] - Ignores the role of geography in creating local Artisanal cesspools and disconnecting "consolidated" corporations from actual geographical settlements. Fails question-begging test.
- Descriptions of world economic history were confusing and difficult to verify or falsify. At the same time, talk brought up an interesting point about countries chunk-competing over the world consumer base. [2]
- Recent talks did an excellent job of portraying Trotskyist theories of populations as composed of material objects. [3]
Motifs
- [IV] [S] proletarian Bonapartism
- [IV] [S2] During the India-Pakistan conflict the Communist Party of India supported the bourgeoisie [4] -> I have no clue whether this is true but I have to doubt it. I think we've got a clash between Trotskyism and Maoism here?
- [S2] The United States wanted to break up Russia [5]
(Put a number list here when appropriate)