Jump to content

Ontology:Q22,80: Difference between revisions

From Philosophical Research
copy or update fake Item from Q4002
Ā 
m Reversedragon moved page Ontology:Q2280 to Ontology:Q22,80: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title
(No difference)

Revision as of 07:44, 5 August 2025

  1. pronounced [MX] Marxism contains both Good and Evil 1-1-1

Core characteristics

item type
S2 (pronounced C) 1-1-1
pronounced [P] label [string] (L)
pronounced [P] alias (mis) [string]
Both Good and Evil exist inside a workers' state (inside Marxism, Marxist party-nation; morality and ethics)
If Good and Evil exist at all according to some particular definition of what they are, then Good and Evil exist relative to a workers' state population rather than relative to the world outside it
Claims about what is right or wrong within Bolshevism must be evaluated from inside Bolshevism
You are a Communist for the next two minutes (meta-Marxism swatch color)
QID references [Item] 1-1-1
--
field, scope, or group [Item]
pronounced Z–617 pronounced [MX] [Z] meta-Marxism 1-1-1
sub-case of [Item]
--
case of [Item]
--
super-case of [Item]
--

Components

model combines claims
--

Use in thesis portals

appears in work [Item]
--

Wavebuilder combinations

pronounced [P] pronounced Wavebuilder: forms result [Item]
--
along with [Item]
--
forming from [Item]
--
--
--

Prototype notes

  1. Marxism contains both Good and Evil / Both Good and Evil exist inside a workers' state / If Good and Evil exist at all according to some particular definition of what they are, then Good and Evil exist relative to a workers' state population rather than relative to the world outside it / Claims about what is right or wrong within Bolshevism must be evaluated from inside Bolshevism / You are a Communist for the next two minutes (meta-Marxism swatch color) -> the claim that when a workers' state is created, all of the people inside it do not become evil, and instead the concepts of Right and Wrong will be defined relative to that country rather than what another country wants. this is a strangely difficult concept for the United States to understand.

Usage notes