User talk:Reversedragon/FirstNineThousand: Difference between revisions
Zensekai question |
yes and no |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Unreleased works? == | == Unreleased works? == | ||
So what do we think about putting monster strains on this thing<br /> | * So what do we think about putting monster strains on this thing<br /> You know, as long as one is willing to update any scrapped mons to at least something current that will be used <br />[[User:Valenoern|Valenoern]] ([[User_talk:Valenoern|talk]]) 15:10, 24 January 2025 (UTC)<!-- | ||
You know, as long as one is willing to update any scrapped mons to at least something current that will be used <br />[[User:Valenoern|Valenoern]] ([[User_talk:Valenoern|talk]]) 15:10, 24 January 2025 (UTC) | --> | ||
** <p>Well, the general rule is that objects inside unreleased works don't go directly into Items, though that's mostly to keep things tidy. Unreleased works are fine in the User: namespace — assuming of course that they're alpha/beta material being put there for the world to reference up to their release, but I'm sure you already understand that distinction.<br /> As for the CDRW tables you sent, those would make great [[:Category:Thesis portals|thesis pages]]. Make a [[Help:Hue lists|hue list]] of your in-progress monster strains using the templates, and they can be Items when there's a demo.</p><!-- | |||
--><p>I absolutely get your thinking. When you look at something like <cite>Monster Rancher</cite> / <cite>Monster Farm</cite> there are a million links back to previous works and forward to new works and sideways to parallel works. What would definitely be okay already is to put all the <cite>Monster Rancher</cite> creatures into the FirstNineThousand list, and all their previous horror / sci-fi movies. — <span style="display: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg);" aria-hidden="true" title="tyrannosaur rampant inverted">🦖</span> [[User:Reversedragon|R.D.]] ([[User talk:Reversedragon|talk]]) 00:54, 25 January 2025 (UTC)</p> | |||
** There is just one problem here which is: where on earth do we fit <em>every single Pokémon</em>? I've been thinking about that. I think Pokémon are banned from the FirstNineThousand just because they won't fit. They can be added later of course. — <span style="display: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg);" aria-hidden="true" title="tyrannosaur rampant inverted">🦖</span> [[User:Reversedragon|R.D.]] ([[User talk:Reversedragon|talk]]) 00:54, 25 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:54, 25 January 2025
Unreleased works?
- So what do we think about putting monster strains on this thing
You know, as long as one is willing to update any scrapped mons to at least something current that will be used
Valenoern (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Well, the general rule is that objects inside unreleased works don't go directly into Items, though that's mostly to keep things tidy. Unreleased works are fine in the User: namespace — assuming of course that they're alpha/beta material being put there for the world to reference up to their release, but I'm sure you already understand that distinction.
As for the CDRW tables you sent, those would make great thesis pages. Make a hue list of your in-progress monster strains using the templates, and they can be Items when there's a demo.I absolutely get your thinking. When you look at something like Monster Rancher / Monster Farm there are a million links back to previous works and forward to new works and sideways to parallel works. What would definitely be okay already is to put all the Monster Rancher creatures into the FirstNineThousand list, and all their previous horror / sci-fi movies. — R.D. (talk) 00:54, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- There is just one problem here which is: where on earth do we fit every single Pokémon? I've been thinking about that. I think Pokémon are banned from the FirstNineThousand just because they won't fit. They can be added later of course. — R.D. (talk) 00:54, 25 January 2025 (UTC)