Ontology:Q59,91

1. S2–59,91 (pronounced 59,91. (S2))[ES] [S2] (pronounced (E.S.) (S2):) Nice walnuts don't get cracked1:-1:-1

Core characteristics

item type

S2 (C (pronounced Category))1:-1:-1

[P] (pronounced P:) label (en) [string] (L)

S2–59,91 (pronounced 59,91. (S2))[ES] [S2] (pronounced (E.S.) (S2):) Nice walnuts don't get cracked1:-1:-1

[P] (pronounced P:) alias (en) [string]

Nice walnuts not getting imminently broken is paradise

Nice walnuts don't get cracked open (simultaneous threat and reassurance)

Freedom is when you have to obey certain rules or not even exist

You must be free or we'll shoot you (Alan Watts)

Countries are like walnuts: they only taste good when you crack them open

Countries Are Like Walnuts (anti-slogan)

walnut proposition (anticommunist conception of countries)

QID (pronounced Q.I.D.) references [Item]1:-1:-1

S2–617 (pronounced 617. (S2))[S2] (pronounced (S2):) Bolshevism is over1:-1:-1

color swatch references [Item]

S2–617 (pronounced 617. (S2))[S2] (pronounced (S2):) Bolshevism is over1:-1:-1

primitive Existentialism (proposed; ES)1:-1:-1

globalization (proposed; ES)1:-1:-1

sub-case of [Item]

--

case of [Item]

proposition against Communism (proposed; ES)1:-1:-1

super-case of [Item]

--

appears in work [Item]

--

relevant quote

--

prototype notes

came up in multiple MDem scraps. the concept is that within Existentialism, national autonomy is never truly taken seriously for any country. people assert platitudes about countries needing to be "free", but what really happens is the sheer population of living people constituting the country is not respected until it's cracked open by force and all the people are forcefully assimilated into one huge Napoleonism or global socially-linked friend circle of capitalists and Careerists. in asserting the right to use force to liberate the "isolated" people of a country from "the thumb" of their country, the State of the outside country extends over like a storm cloud and carries out the democratic decisions of somebody else completely unelected. imagine a world where people took child abuse as seriously as they take "authoritarian countries". 1000 people, probably with weapons, would flood the abusive household and throw out the parent. they wouldn't care if that was illegal by anybody's standards, they'd just do it. but also, if that sounds like a genuinely good idea to you, just keep in mind that you'd also get 1000 reactionaries tossing people's parents out of the state for letting them be transgender, or letting them go to a school that teaches inclusive history. at maximum democulture, all the children turn into walnuts that you have to crack open and carry over to the reactionary-school bowl. those hypothetical kids are not free. they're captured by the Social-Philosophical System that decided to define what Freedom is and leap its personal State over them. don't think too hard about what that analogy might be saying about literal Social-Philosophical Systems in daily life. the only thing I'll say there is, I'm really tired of hegemony politics and everything being run by Filaments. none of it makes any sense, and up to now nobody's said anything about it that's true. like, everything anybody tells you about Liberalism is some kind of small lie. what's up with that?

Components

model combines claims

--

Wavebuilder combinations

[P] (pronounced P:) Wavebuilder (pronounced Wave-builder): forms result [Item]

--

along with [Item]

--

forming from [Item]

--

--

--

Wavebuilder characterizations

Wavebuilder (pronounced Wave-builder): route [Item]

--

along with [Item]

--

forming from [Item]

--

--

--