Ontology:Q60,72

1. [A] (pronounced A; S2:)60,72Fan theories should be atomic thoughts1:-1:-1

Core characteristics

item type

S2 (C (pronounced Category))1:-1:-1

[P] (pronounced P:) label (en) [string] (L)

[A] (pronounced A; S2:)60,72Fan theories should be atomic thoughts1:-1:-1

(... full list of aliases)

QID (pronounced Q.I.D.) references [Item]1:-1:-1

--

case of [Item]

--

Wavebuilder combinations

[P] (pronounced P:) Wavebuilder (pronounced Wave-builder): forms result [Item]

--

along with [Item]

[A] (pronounced A; S2:)60,72Fan theories should be atomic thoughts1:-1:-1

forming from [Item]

[A] (pronounced A; S2:)60,72Fan theories should be atomic thoughts1:-1:-1

--

--

Wavebuilder characterizations

Wavebuilder (pronounced Wave-builder): route [Item]

[A] (pronounced A; S2:)60,72Fan theories should be atomic thoughts1:-1:-1

along with [Item]

--

forming from [Item]

--

--

[A] (pronounced A; S2:)60,72Fan theories should be atomic thoughts1:-1:-1

Prototype notes

618. Fan theories should be atomic thoughts / Fan theories should be atomic propositions / Fans don't like hour-long theories because they don't have enough spaces for choices and thus they aren't Freedom; single propositions are more agreeable because it is easier to free-associate onto one or the other and take or leave them -> I have never heard an anarchist say this out loud, but I do know the recurring patterns I see written all over everything.
     this.... probably partly explains the appeal of Pokémon. the potential of free association around individual Pokémon stages and the (partial) lack of a single narrative. it may be terribly obvious to anybody not playing the games that they're linear and repetitive, meaning there's a narrative there, but to anyone still playing them, it would be more "obvious" to "notice" the ability to constantly make choices and do something different.