Jump to content

Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q64,30: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From LithoGraphica
Newer edit →
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
14,257 edits
copy markup from 9k/Q697
 
Reversedragon (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Conference pass, Interface administrators, Arts-aligned editors, Crimson-aligned editors, Violet-aligned editors, Administrators
14,257 edits
m Reversedragon moved page Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q6430 to Ontology talk:9k/RD/Q64,30: Moving numbered Item to TTS-pronounceable title
(No difference)

Revision as of 03:42, 23 April 2026

Main entry

  1. Ace Attorney (metaseries) -> I had no reason to add this until suddenly I was watching it just for context on 'cross-examine the parrot', and then was like, oh wait, this game is about logic. it's not actually about real court procedure as much as it's about an abstract concept of "reason". which... makes it surprisingly relevant to a wiki about logic. ok. time to code it.
  2. Ace Attorney

Motifs

  1. lawyer of justice -> intuitive, because it's at least vaguely what their stated purpose is.
  2. lawyer of injustice -> it's rarer you see this in fiction and yet Homestuck catapulted the idea into popular consciousness.
  3. See through one lie, and their whole testimony falls apart / Lies always beget more lies. See through one, and their whole testimony falls apart (Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney tutorial) [1] -> you know what joke I'm going to make.

Related

Ideology codes

  • (none)
Retrieved from "https://research.moraleconomy.au/index.php?title=Ontology_talk:9k/RD/Q64,30&oldid=42395"