Ontology:Q40,13

1. [S2] (pronounced [S2]) Trotskyist groups are a safe space for Trotskyist identity 1:(-)1:(-)1

Core characteristics

item type

S2 (C (pronounced C)) 1:(-)1:(-)1

[P] (pronounced [P]) label [string] (L)

1. REDIRECT Ontology:Q40,15

[P] (pronounced [P]) alias (mis) [string]

Trotskyist groups are appealing as a place for Trotskyists to safely be Trotskyists

QID references [Item] 1:(-)1:(-)1

--

color swatch references [Item]

--

sub-case of [Item]

--

case of [Item]

meta-Marxist hypothesis

super-case of [Item]

--

relevant quote

--

prototype notes

this sounds like a joke until you realize what it actually means, at which point it sounds more reasonable. this is operating on the definition of "safe space" as a Social-Graph System or Social-Philosophical System that people dive into in order to be accepted and not to be questioned on basic facts of their individual identity; under this definition, things such as a Christian church or a Muslim mosque may qualify as a safe space for Christian or Muslim identity, due to the fact that within that space a particular religion is condoned or practiced consistently. thus, this is the claim that Trotskyist groups exist partly to be a loose "congregation" of Trotskyist theorists where Trotskyist theories are condoned and practiced consistently, rather than being rejected from "Stalinist spaces". the Trotskyist theories in question do attempt to do what Marxist theories should do, to unite groups and mobilize workers, yet at the same time, when a group is founded it must explicitly make a choice on whether Trotskyist theories are allowed at all or perhaps preferred, versus whether they are fundamentally rejected from the group. this necessity to either accept or reject people who align with the 1930s Trotskyite conspiracy, or modern Trotskyism, creates a fundamental cultural divide between different Marxist organizations similar to the divide between a Marxist organization in one country versus a Marxist organization in another country, or between a movement for White transgender people inside the United States versus a movement for Black subpopulations inside the United States — Trotskyists are their own countable Culture, as much as Ukrainians are distinct from Russians. the matter of how Trotskyist identity as a countable Culture interacts with "other" demographic identities is not necessarily well understood. there are only two small thoughts I can offer on that: A) look at a British Trotskyist group, and you will probably observe that its members fail to see outside a White, British perspective, for instance often failing to quite understand what is going on for Black subpopulations in the United States and why they frame things the way they do, based on what locally-preferred ideologies (often anarchism or some Fanon-based non-Marxist theory). B) this same problem didn't necessarily exist for Trotsky's circle of people, who at the very least understood Jewish subpopulational struggles, even if they were baffled in their own way by United States racism. so, there are times when Trotskyist identity clashes with racial subpopulation identity, although it does depend on the quality of theorists admitted to a Trotskyist group. this + ?? = Trotskyism is the prototypical oppressed group.

Components

model combines claims

--

Use in thesis portals

appears in work [Item]

--

Wavebuilder combinations

[P] (pronounced [P]) Wavebuilder (pronounced Wavebuilder): forms result [Item]

Q2945 Trotskyism is the prototypical oppressed group (proposed; MX) 1:(-)1:(-)1

along with [Item]

1. REDIRECT Ontology:Q40,15

forming from [Item]

REDIRECT Ontology:Q40,15

 ??

Q2945 Trotskyism is the prototypical oppressed group (proposed; MX) 1:(-)1:(-)1