Ontology:Q22,44
- pronounced [S2] Being wrong means relinquishing freedom 1-1-1
Core characteristics
- item type
- S2 (pronounced C) 1-1-1
- pronounced [P] alias (en) [string]
- Admitting you're wrong requires relinquishing freedom
- pronounced [P] alias (en-x-pona) [string]
- Being wrong means giving up freedom
- QID references [Item] 1-1-1
- --
- color swatch references [Item]
- --
- sub-case of [Item]
- --
- case of [Item]
- --
- super-case of [Item]
- --
- topic or subject [Item] (TS)
- --
Components
- model combines claims
- --
Use in thesis portals
- appears in work [Item]
- --
Wavebuilder combinations
- pronounced [P] pronounced Wavebuilder: forms result [Item]
- pronounced S–66,29 pronounced [UTDR] [S] Berdly (Deltarune) 1-1-1
- along with [Item]
- pronounced [S2] Being wrong means relinquishing freedom 1-1-1
- forming from [Item]
- pronounced [S2] Being wrong means relinquishing freedom 1-1-1
- Lightner (Deltarune)
- pronounced S–66,29 pronounced [UTDR] [S] Berdly (Deltarune) 1-1-1
Accessibility test:
{{WaveBuildNone| {{E:Q22,44}} | Lightner (Deltarune) | {{E:Q66,29}} }} <!-- en: WITH Lightner PRODUCES Berdly -->
Prototype notes
- Being wrong means relinquishing freedom / Being wrong means giving up freedom (en-x-pona) / Admitting you're wrong requires relinquishing freedom -> derived Existentialist proposition, though I don't totally know what it's derived from. the reason people don't like to admit they're wrong. every time people are busy being wrong, they're also busy exerting individual will and effort to do what they want to do and be where they want to be. people are always told, try hard, believe in yourself, and you will surely be allowed to do anything. in practice, this saying isn't remotely correct. it's all too easy for somebody to try hard, go into physics, mess with string theory, create a wrong model, and end up getting bullied out of science simply for not magically being perfect and guessing the correct thing in a world where the material topics of science are getting so utterly esoteric that nothing can properly be tested before it's published. or try hard, try to create art, and suddenly a bunch of Gramscians or anarchists or postcolonial theorists show up and are like, you're not fit to make art, you didn't magically know what every prejudice and microaggression is when speaking in terms of the physical communication of information you couldn't possibly have known. my issue here obviously isn't that there are standards, it's just the way anarchists and Gramscians elevate socially constructed standards to natural law and expect people to automatically know things that require education.