Ontology:Q49,93
- pronounced [S2] Leninism is over but "Marxism" is not 1-1-1
Core characteristics
- item type
- S2 (pronounced C) 1-1-1
- pronounced [P] label [string] (L)
- pronounced [S2] Leninism is over but "Marxism" is not 1-1-1
- (DX swatch) Bolshevism is over but Marxism is not
- pronounced [P] alias (en) [string]
- --
- QID references [Item] 1-1-1
- --
- field, scope, or group [Item]
- pronounced Z–617 pronounced [W] [Z]Western Marxism 1-1-1
- Deng Xiaoping Thought 1-1-1
- sub-case of [Item]
- --
- case of [Item]
- --
- super-case of [Item]
- Party-nations are not actually Marxist
- appears in work [Item]
- --
- consists of components [Item]
- --
Wavebuilder combinations
- pronounced [P] pronounced Wavebuilder: forms result [Item]
- --
- along with [Item]
- --
Characterizations
- pronounced Wavebuilder: route [Item]
- --
- along with [Item]
- --
Prototype notes
- Leninism is over but "Marxism" is not -> I'm half convinced that every time somebody implies this (and isn't from China, Cuba, or Vietnam) that it's literally just a way to sneak in Existentialism and deceive people into believing all the things smaller than Liberalism and capitalism that ultimately reconstruct capitalism. half the time I laugh at this one and half the time I get angry, because it tends to trap people in this loop of insisting that if you don't believe Marxism can be used to purge people of all incorrect beliefs and create a perfect society full of nice people before getting rid of capitalism you're racist, while due to the actual material definition of capitalism, if they believe it it makes them absolutely, absolutely incapable of stopping people from becoming racist, digging them deeper and deeper into this hole they can never get out of.
- Marxism is over but party-nations are not / Marxism is over but Leninism is not -> the claim that central party-nations are not over but the attempt to regulate the stochastic sorting of people into corporate countable Cultures basically is. somewhat credible when there are about three countries that can vouch for it. many people like to think you can immediately springboard off this to justifying Existentialism but you actually can't. it almost implies the opposite: that primitive Existentialism is most stable when it's regulated from above and not allowed to become a government in and of itself.
Usage notes
This is the claim that early Marxism, as laid out by Marx and Engels, still has some amount of accuracy or relevance to reality although Leninism as laid out by Lenin, Stalin, Hoxha, Mao, or Trotsky is claimed not to hold such accuracy or relevance. People may have varying reasons for claiming that Leninism has been rejected, which would all be their own propositions. This is simply the overall claim that some collection of central components of Leninism is not true.
One major category of philosophies which will claim this is simply plain old anticommunism. The other is Deng Xiaoping Thought.