Ontology:P206

1. [P] (pronounced P:) "Object test" [rating]

[P] (pronounced P:) "Object test" [rating]

field value

test passed

"Object" [pass]

test failed

"Object" [fail]

Characteristics in draft

Properties

item type

P

[P] (pronounced P:) label (en) [string] (L)

[P] (pronounced P:) "Object test" [rating]

[P] (pronounced P:) alias (en) [string]

--

QID (pronounced Q.I.D.) references [Item]1:-1:-1

[P] (pronounced P:) rating [rating]

color swatch references [Item]

historical materialism

Property data type

item

instance of

communication rating level

Prototype notes

• Can one take this description or argument and identify the historical progression of tangible objects and processes it is describing? ("Object test")
  • This one is a bit subjective, and thus wouldn't actually fail most things. For me a lot of postmodern / poststructuralist / Foucaldian type things become suspect under this test because I'm always like, what object are you describing? Spit out what you're describing! What object would you rather not exist and what object would you like to change it into?? Don't just tell me "signs"!