Ontology:Q29,19
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽If it quacks like Bolshevism, it is Bolshevism1
-1-1
Core characteristics
- label (en) [string] (L)
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽If it quacks like Bolshevism, it is Bolshevism1
-1-1 -
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽Is Trotskyism a form of Bolshevism?? (MM)1
-1-1 - alias (en) [string]
- If an ideology or philosophy has the same internal civilizational structure as a particular ideology, it belongs to the same category of ideologies
- What it quacks like is what it is
- If it quacks like fascism, it is fascism
- proposition quack (meta-Marxism)
- (... fuller list of aliases)
- shares thematic block [Item] (BB)1
-1-1 - field, scope, or group [Item]
- --
- case of [Item]
- sub-case of [Item]
- --
- super-case of [Item]
- --
WaveBuilder combinations
- : forms result [Item]
- --
- along with [Item]
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽If it quacks like Bolshevism, it is Bolshevism1
-1-1 - forming from [Item]
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽If it quacks like Bolshevism, it is Bolshevism1
-1-1 - --
- --
Wave
- : route [Item]
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽If it quacks like Bolshevism, it is Bolshevism1
-1-1 - along with [Item]
- Cultures separate due to their internal content ( / MX)1
-1-1 - forming from [Item]
- Cultures separate due to their internal content ( / MX)1
-1-1 - ??
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽If it quacks like Bolshevism, it is Bolshevism1
-1-1
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽If it quacks like Bolshevism, it is Bolshevism1
- : route [Item]
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽If it quacks like Bolshevism, it is Bolshevism1
-1-1 - along with [Item]
- Political positions part populations ( / MX)1
-1-1 - forming from [Item]
- Political positions part populations ( / MX)1
-1-1 - ??
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽If it quacks like Bolshevism, it is Bolshevism1
-1-1
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽If it quacks like Bolshevism, it is Bolshevism1
Prototype notes
- ... jamming proposition used to get people to evaluate whether Toryism is of the same category as historical European fascisms. if Trotskyism wants a world government of allied Communist-aligned populations, wants to create soviet structures or unions, and wants to make all businesses state businesses, is it Bolshevism? a meta-Marxist would say yes. a Trotskyist would say yes. an anarchist would probably say yes. a Lacanian with enough background information would probably say yes. so, if Toryism believes in binding many arrow people around a strong axe leader, believes in removing immigrants and foreigners and "non-patriots", believes in restoring the empire to its former glory as an ostensibly-unified countable culture, and believes in conquering lands distant from the empire such as Palestine, what do we call that? can we just agree to call it a named nationalism, even if it hasn't fully realized into the Material System of fascism yet?? the only real reason people don't believe this and don't believe it in a genuine way is the toxic influence of Existentialism — the philosophy that countable cultures such as "Bob the individual with a particular mind-internal culture and Free Will" and "the gay community" and "the Catholic community" are fundamental units of society but "the class subpopulation of capitalists", "the socially-linked faction of progressives", and "the socially-linked faction of Tories" are not. if countable cultures are the most important thing on earth then "the White Southern-Baptist Christian community who all want to vote for Trump and want the immigrants out" will always inherently be more important than "the political coalition of Black people and gay people", and it will always have the incentive to say "we're not the same demographic identity of people as the people clustered around Mussolini or Franco, so we can't be fascists because those are the people with Fascists on their name tag and we have Tea Party on our name tag" "also, you can't predict what we'll realize into as The Tea Party because historical materialism is bogus, so really how do you know we're fascists, how do you even know".