Ontology:Q3406
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽Anarchists can be a class
1-1-1
Core characteristics
- label (en) [string] (L)
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽Anarchists can be a class
1-1-1 - (... fuller list of aliases)
- field, scope, or group [Item]
- --
- sub-case of [Item]
- --
- case of [Item]
- --
- super-case of [Item]
- --
Component claims
Wavebuilder combinations
- : forms result [Item]
- anarchist republic ( / A)1
-1-1 - along with [Item]
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽Anarchists can be a class
1-1-1 - forming from [Item]
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽Anarchists can be a class
1-1-1 - dictatorship-of-the-proletariat ( / ML)1
-1-1 - anarchist republic ( / A)1
-1-1
- anarchist republic ( / A)1
Wavebuilder characterizations
- : route [Item]
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽Anarchists can be a class
1-1-1 - along with [Item]
- --
-
⧼hue-ins-domain-spacer/⧽Anarchists can be a class
Prototype notes
- Non-greedy people are a class -> after listening to too many things containing either sincere or appropriated anarchist signifiers, I am convinced some people think this. "Greed"/"non-competitive balance" is the single most common wrong idea I have seen in every center-Liberal or anarchist or anticommunist argument; it's everywhere. it seems to be fundamental to the way most anarchists define the hypothetical capable subpopulation of people that can end capitalism. they start with the whole population and then they just start defining relatively arbitrary criteria including actual wealth or having prejudices for crossing out "the greedy ones". the big problem is that when we're at the "hierarchy"/prejudice criterion it can really come down to having the wrong definitions of words or not having the models people command you to. it becomes very paradoxical because it's based on what people believe or feel rather than on what's verifiable, and that can easily just lead to two or three groups of people shouting at each other, ordering each other around but insisting they won't listen to each other because they've effectively created circular hierarchies onto each other and they want freedom.
Anarchists can be a class
(meta-Marxism) / In violet Marxism, anarchists can constitute a class, although this is only true under highly specific conditions — there can be an anarchist class if and when anarchists create repeatable social structures that are capable of joining up as a repeated pattern and overtaking the bourgeoisie as a repeated pattern; this is to imply that it is necessary for named anarchisms with specific internal structure to exist for anarchists to successfully pull off an anarchist revolution as a new class (in meta-Marxism; meta-Marxism onto Marxism) -> a thought that occurred to me while listening to Trotskyists attempting to explain the difference between early Cuba and Deng Xiaoping Thought in terms of the national bourgeoisie successfully or unsuccessfully taking up the position of defending the country
Non-greedy people are a class + ?? = Anarchists can be a class.
- Anarchists can be a class / It may actually be the case that anarchists are able to defeat the bourgeoisie as a class of anarchists, but only under highly specific conditions / Anarchists constitute a class if and when a lot of charcoal-aligned social structures are able to defeat the bourgeoisie / Anarchists can constitute a class, inasmuch as that under very specific conditions they may be able to create repeatable social structures that are capable of all joining up and overtaking the bourgeoisie permanently such that there exists a unique dictatorship-of-the-anarchists where things that are not anarchism are no longer allowed; this is to imply that anarchists can only successfully function as a class if and when they belong to one or more named anarchisms with a specific internal structure (Bauplan) and plan for continuous societal development in which particular productive forces and granting-node relationships are developed to their capacity and then expanded each time such a thing is needed in order to allow for the development of core anarchist goals such as universal education, voluntary work, and leisure
anarchist republic
/ dictatorship-of-the-anarchists (meta-Marxist term) -> the motif of a capable subpopulation of anarchists that when standing together as all the inner structures that make up a particular named anarchism are capable in some hypothetical situation of clearing all bourgeois class territories out of an area and preventing the return of a dictatorship-of-the-bourgeoisie.