Jump to content

Ontology:Q36,61

From Philosophical Research
Revision as of 04:42, 19 August 2025 by Reversedragon (talk | contribs) (copy or update fake Item from Q3666)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
  1. pronounced [MX] Dengism is a postcolonial theory 1-1-1

Core characteristics

item type
S2 (pronounced C) 1-1-1
pronounced [P] label [string] (L)
pronounced [MX] Dengism is a postcolonial theory 1-1-1
pronounced [P] alias (en) [string]
Deng Xiaoping Thought is a postcolonial theory
Deng Xiaoping Thought is part of a new category of postcolonial theories solidly based in Materialism instead of Idealism
QID references [Item] 1-1-1
--
sub-case of [Item]
--
case of [Item]
explanation of colonialism (proposed; A) 1-1-1
topic or subject [Item] (TS)
--

Components

model combines claims
--

Wavebuilder combinations

pronounced [P] pronounced Wavebuilder: forms result [Item]
--
along with [Item]
--
forming from [Item]
--
--
--

Prototype notes

  1. Deng Xiaoping Thought
  2. East Germany was indistinguishable from an Anarchism / East Germany was actually an Anarchism -> I am pretty sure this is false but I could not actually explain why. so this is basically one of those "man is equivalent to a chicken" type statements. the heart of this probably-spurious claim would be that because events like Black Lives Matter and the Paris Commune were built around people of a particular idealistic countable Culture assertively occupying a particular spatial area, the distinction between a hypothetical successful Anarchism and a real-world historical fortress state is rather fuzzy. what actually is the difference? you can't say that a fortress state is different from an Anarchism because it's based around the proletariat, because North Korea became a fortress state and hardly had a proletariat at all. I guess you could appeal to "The State", but personally? in my opinion an army always counts as having a State. that's the easiest way to interpret the Trotskyite conspiracy as the seeds of a plural Marxism and open up the road to diplomacy and healing traumas between rival Marxisms. so like, if an Anarchism always realistically has to have a State to perform realization and exist, how is it actually different from a fortress state?
  3. Deng Xiaoping Thought is a postcolonial theory / Deng Xiaoping Thought is part of a new category of postcolonial theories solidly based in Materialism instead of Idealism -> the claim that because it is primarily focused on maintaining the national independence of China and not on creating Bolshevism or abolishing capitalism, Deng Xiaoping Thought is not a Leninism but does instead qualify as a postcolonial theory. if this is true, there would exist a category of Marxisms which are postcolonial theories based in Materialism but are not Leninisms.
    I'm not positive on this one, yet there is just enough of an argument here to change over Deng Xiaoping Thought to the strawberry swatch, as a rather complimentary use of that swatch that contrasts all its negative meanings. it's better than giving any statist things the charcoal swatch. probably... Deng Xiaoping Thought needs its own ideology code now. ok. MZ and DX are the new codes for Maoism and Deng Xiaoping Thought.
  4. Juche-socialism is a postcolonial theory / Juche-socialism is part of a new category of postcolonial theories solidly based in Materialism instead of Idealism -> I think there's also equally as good a case for this.
  5. East Germany was a postcolonial movement / East Germany provides evidence for a new category of postcolonial theories solidly based in Materialism instead of Idealism -> I think this is one possible answer to the jamming question of whether East Germany was "an anarchism". the claim would be that all successful instances of creating a workers' state have been postcolonial movements, and it has been a fundamental truth of workers' states that they operate on ensuring the whole population is competitive against or defended against all the other countries around it who every day still eat and occupy space — postcolonial movements are in contradiction with degrowth and the environment, contrary to what everyone wants to think, and only either industry or a very concerted push from as many Third World individuals as possible to form a coherent and operational civilization and a unified government can actually make Third World nationalities free. said another way, if Third World people can solve Trotskyism and merge into one big country of like 5 billion people they're good on having to build more industry or damage the environment, but it's still the case anarchism has to go.