Ontology:Q65,49

Core characteristics

item type: S2 (pronounced C) 1-1-1
pronounced [P] label [string] (L): pronounced [S2] The Cold War was a social construct 1-1-1
pronounced [P] alias (en) [string]: The opposition of Liberal-republican countries against the Soviet Union was nothing more than a social construct in which Liberal-republican countries made up reasons to hate the 14 nationalities of the Soviet Union for reasons largely unrelated to the class composition of the two countries, and related more to the affinity between the 14 major Soviet ethnic groups and the anomalous, hateful non-affinity between the United States and those ethnic groups
QID references [Item] 1-1-1: --
field, scope, or group [Item]: --
sub-case of [Item]: --
case of [Item]: derived anarchist proposition (proposed; A) 1-1-1
super-case of [Item]: --

: --
along with [Item]: pronounced [S2] The Cold War was a social construct 1-1-1
forming from [Item]: pronounced [S2] The Cold War was a social construct 1-1-1; --; --

: pronounced [S2] The Cold War was a social construct 1-1-1
along with [Item]: --
forming from [Item]: --; --; pronounced [S2] The Cold War was a social construct 1-1-1

The Cold War was a social construct / The opposition of Liberal-republican countries against the Soviet Union was nothing more than a social construct in which Liberal-republican countries made up reasons to hate the 14 nationalities of the Soviet Union for reasons largely unrelated to the class composition of the two countries, and related more to the affinity between the 14 major Soviet ethnic groups and the anomalous, hateful non-affinity between the United States and those ethnic groups -> persuade me of this using specifically the Russian Revolution, the Soviet Union, and the Cold War, and I might genuinely consider postcolonial anarchisms. I feel like the difficulty of arguing that verges on impossible, but maybe that's just me. I've made it a little easier by leaving out the requirement that anarchism explains how to defeat the Russian empire or win the Cold War, and only handing you the impossible task of arguing Soviet people and United States racists who to this day can hardly stand the idea of somebody living in another country and being Russian are obligated to be friends. that's what I don't understand. how, when United States people are constantly dismissing the existence of reactionaries in their own country as a totally ignorable non- part of their lives, that anarchisms or postcolonial theories that say every opposition between groups of people is an arbitrary decision each group made are supposed to fix anything.