Ontology:Q22,30
- pronounced [MX] Determinism separates center-Liberals from Communists 1-1-1
Core characteristics[edit]
- item type
- S2 (pronounced C) 1-1-1
- pronounced [P] alias (en) [string]
- Determinism separates Liberal-republicans from Communists
- Determinism separates Liberalism from Communism
- The greatest difference between Liberal-republicanism and Bolshevism is free will versus determinism
- QID references [Item] 1-1-1
- --
- color swatch references [Item]
- --
- sub-case of [Item]
- --
- case of [Item]
- --
- super-case of [Item]
- --
- topic or subject [Item] (TS)
- --
Components[edit]
- model combines claims
- --
Use in thesis portals[edit]
- appears in work [Item]
- --
Wavebuilder combinations[edit]
- pronounced [P] pronounced Wavebuilder: forms result [Item]
- --
- along with [Item]
- --
Prototype notes[edit]
- Determinism separates Liberalism from Communism / The greatest difference between Liberal-republicanism and Bolshevism is free will versus determinism -> once you understand "determinism" as limited portions of the universe performing "chemical reactions" rather than as universe-wide predetermination, it all clicks into place.
Usage notes[edit]
Item label[edit]
United States people become furious at the prospect of being called "Liberalism" or "Liberals" with the attempt to assign these terms a negative meaning. There is a certain deeply-ingrained mythos that "liberalism" can only refer to the state of taking any kind of country population and making it better and more free, and thus any progressive must definitionally be a "liberal" and every progressive ideology must definitionally be part of the same population which must not violate the rules of the United States constitution but must not be insulted. Due to this, Item labels usually refer to the system of Liberalism as "Liberal-republicanism" to make the two terms distinct in spoken language, or go one step further and refer only to "center-Liberals" or "Liberal-republicans" as a demographic identity. Assuming first that the rest of the statement is neutral rather than charged, these kind of "identity" statements may be less likely to be taken as negative statements, given that there has been a particular increasing bias across the United States toward the concept of identities being a universally good thing as long as identities choose to get along. It is a particularly Existentialist thing to insist that every social problem can be solved precisely by focusing on the humanity of human individuals through emphasizing the fact that individuals exist at all and all identities are baked into living, breathing, experiencing individuals. Nonetheless, any method that successfully makes proposition meanings more intuitive in spite of the steep character limit on proposition labels is acceptable.