Jump to content

Ontology:P206

From Philosophical Research
  1. pronounced [P] "Object test" [rating]
pronounced [P] "Object test" [rating]
field value
test passed
"Object" [pass]
test failed
"Object" [fail]

Characteristics in draft[edit]

Properties[edit]

item type
P
label (en)
pronounced [P] "Object test" [rating]
alias (en)
--
QID references
pronounced [P] rating [rating]
color swatch references
historical materialism
Property data type
item
instance of
communication rating level

Prototype notes[edit]

  • Can one take this description or argument and identify the historical progression of tangible objects and processes it is describing? ("Object test")
    • This one is a bit subjective, and thus wouldn't actually fail most things. For me a lot of postmodern / poststructuralist / Foucaldian type things become suspect under this test because I'm always like, what object are you describing? Spit out what you're describing! What object would you rather not exist and what object would you like to change it into?? Don't just tell me "signs"!