Ontology:Q22,79
Appearance
- pronounced [MX] Sabine Hossenfelder should be a Communist 11 -1 -
Core characteristics[edit]
- item type
- S2 (pronounced C) 11 -1 -
- pronounced [P] label [string] (L)
- pronounced [MX] Sabine Hossenfelder should be a Communist 11 -1 -
- E:Sabine Hossenfelder should be a Communist
- pronounced [P] alias (en) [string]
- --
- QID references [Item] 11 -1 -
- --
- field, scope, or group [Item]
- --
- sub-case of [Item]
- --
- case of [Item]
- --
- super-case of [Item]
- --
Use in thesis portals[edit]
- appears in work [Item]
- --
Component claims[edit]
- Science should only keep true hypotheses (proposed; STM) 11 -1 -
- Peer review controls the process of discarding hypotheses (proposed; STM) 11 -1 -
- University hiring controls the process of discarding hypotheses (proposed; STM) 11 -1 -
- String theory doesn't belong in universities (proposed; STM) 11 -1 -
- Marxism is based in practice and keeping correct hypotheses (proposed; ML) 11 -1 -
- Compensating CPC members according to contribution will not cause problems (proposed; ML) 11 -1 -
- A party-nation should retain only good theorists (proposed; ML) 11 -1 -
- The CPSU was no worse without Trotsky (proposed; ML) 11 -1 -
- Expelling Trotsky was good for the Soviet Union (proposed; ML) 11 -1 -
- In 1950 Stalin's government was aligned with the proletariat (proposed; ML) 11 -1 -
- A Marxist party process does what the country wants (proposed; ML) 11 -1 -
- Doing what the country wants is indistinguishable from democracy (proposed; ML) 11 -1 -
- Liberal-republicanism is constantly unraveling lessons instead of learning them (proposed; ML) 11 -1 -
- A country could learn its lessons better through Marxism (proposed; ML) 11 -1 -
- pronounced [MX] Sabine Hossenfelder should be a Communist 11 -1 -
Wavebuilder combinations[edit]
- pronounced [P] pronounced Wavebuilder: forms result [Item]
- --
- along with [Item]
- --
Prototype notes[edit]
- Sabine Hossenfelder should be a Communist -> sounds laughable until you see her argument against string theory in universities, and then it's like, put this woman in charge of educating the US or Europe about Trotsky and how he didn't understand the process of coming to scientific consensuses and putting real experts on emerging historical-materialist science in the party, and nobody would get the history of Communism wrong ever again. I swear. everybody would suddenly have a light bulb go off that Liberal-republicanism is based on letting stupid people make objections to real sensible answers and would have this terrible dread-filled vision that oh god, we've been doing everything wrong and there would just be this mass flip over to various Marxisms