Ontology:Q22,82
Appearance
- pronounced [S2] Communist laws are laws 11 -1 -
Core characteristics[edit]
- item type
- S2 (pronounced C) 11 -1 -
- pronounced [P] label [string] (L)
- pronounced [S2] Communist laws are laws 11 -1 -
- E:Communist laws are laws
- pronounced [P] alias (en) [string]
- Communist laws are laws
- Rule of law in a Marxist state is rule of law
- When enumerating Communist atrocities, "enforcing Bolshevism" doesn't count
- QID references [Item] 11 -1 -
- --
- field, scope, or group [Item]
- pronounced Z–617 pronounced [MX] [Z] meta-Marxism 11 -1 -
- sub-case of [Item]
- --
- case of [Item]
- --
- super-case of [Item]
- --
Use in thesis portals[edit]
- appears in work [Item]
- --
Component claims[edit]
- pronounced [MX] You are a Communist for the next two minutes (SU) 11 -1 -
- Laws exist to protect populations
- Governments exist to control laws
- The general population should be able to control laws
- Workers' states exist to keep a tiny collection of chunk owners from writing all the laws
- pronounced [S2] Communist laws are laws 11 -1 -
Wavebuilder combinations[edit]
- pronounced [P] pronounced Wavebuilder: forms result [Item]
- --
- along with [Item]
- --
Prototype notes[edit]
- ... I am so tired of the trope that Marxist states cannot have laws. the United States will go around labeling all kinds of things natural crimes and asserting it has the right to beat them up without any established government structure or laws permitting that. in such irony when supposedly absolutely everything inside the United States including its movements has to follow Congress and the constitution and some of us even get mad about case law and try to tear case law out. but as soon as Marxist states have laws that's bad, because they're not United States laws. I'm not sure there even is any such thing as the rule of law when capitalism exists, because the rule of law would be actually accepting that there can be a plurality of rules of law and they usually are not supposed to disturb each other.