Ontology:Q26,15

1. [S2] (pronounced [S2]) Cuba's "private sector" means the bourgeoisie 1:(-)1:(-)1

Core characteristics

item type

S2 (C (pronounced C)) 1:(-)1:(-)1

[P] (pronounced [P]) label [string] (L)

[S2] (pronounced [S2]) Cuba's "private sector" means the bourgeoisie 1:(-)1:(-)1

E:Cuba's private sector means the bourgeoisie

[P] (pronounced [P]) alias (mis) [string]

If Cuba contains a private sector, it contains the bourgeoisie

QID references [Item] 1:(-)1:(-)1

--

field, scope, or group [Item]

mainstream Marxism-Leninism (proposed; ML) 1:(-)1:(-)1

sub-case of [Item]

--

case of [Item]

--

super-case of [Item]

--

Components

model combines claims

--

Use in thesis portals

appears in work [Item]

--

Wavebuilder combinations

[P] (pronounced [P]) Wavebuilder (pronounced Wavebuilder): forms result [Item]

--

along with [Item]

--

forming from [Item]

--

--

--

Prototype notes

2615. ... this should be a prosaic statement but it apparently needs to be said. why does Cuba contain a bourgeoisie? there is a big, sprawling discussion to be had about why exactly workers' states give up and start regenerating the bourgeoisie. is this a process that stops on a particular date in history, or is it more similar to a life history event that occurs in the life cycle of an individual which thus needs to be countered continuously at each moment society regenerates? with meta-Marxism I have been slowly leaning toward the latter, toward the hypothesis that even if defeating the bourgeoisie in a Communist revolution can help, it isn't a one-time process. this does, fortunately or unfortunately, open up vague possibilities of there being methods to block the regeneration of the bourgeoisie in a charcoal-tinted transition process. it had better be pretty good though, given that anarchism itself has a tendency to regenerate the bourgeoisie.