Term:Post-philosophies: Difference between revisions
copy or update fake Item from maladaptive discipline |
m category |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
== Usage notes == | == Usage notes == | ||
The term "post- philosophies" was used for a brief period around the time of <cite>MDem</cite> 4.3 — one or two entries posited the hypothetical existence of "post-Trotskyism" and "post-Lacanianism". By the time of <cite>MDem</cite> 5.3, this concept is usually referred to as "meta- philosophies", and the constructs used are instead "meta-Trotskyism", "meta-anarchism", and "meta-Lacanianism". The major difference between these two sets of terms is that "postification" did not go into deep detail about how exactly ideologies were to be "post-ified", whereas the new terms invoke the concept of [[Term:meta-ontology|meta-ontology]] as one of the major engines of meta-Marxist analysis which is capable of operating on any philosophy ever conceived without the requirement for any other philosophy to accept historical materialism or class analysis. | The term "post- philosophies" was used for a brief period around the time of <cite>MDem</cite> 4.3 — one or two entries posited the hypothetical existence of "post-Trotskyism" and "post-Lacanianism". By the time of <cite>MDem</cite> 5.3, this same concept is usually referred to as "meta- philosophies", and the constructs used are instead "meta-Trotskyism", "meta-anarchism", and "meta-Lacanianism". The major difference between these two sets of terms is that "postification" did not go into deep detail about how exactly ideologies were to be "post-ified", whereas the new terms invoke the concept of [[Term:meta-ontology|meta-ontology]] as one of the major engines of meta-Marxist analysis which is capable of operating on any philosophy ever conceived without the requirement for any other philosophy to accept historical materialism or class analysis. | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Hue-format fake Lexemes]] __NOTOC__ | ||
Latest revision as of 06:48, 17 August 2025
- pronounced [L] post-philosophy 1-1-1
Definitions[edit]
- A body of philosophical claims which has been run through postification methods in order to produce a mirror set of claims which are proposed to be more correct.
- represented by form [Form]
- post- philosophy
- field, scope, or group [Item]
- pronounced S–617 pronounced [S] meta-ontology 1-1-1
- uses or studies [Item] (FY)
- --
- signifier refers to model
- --
- formed from Lexemes [Sense / Lexeme] (RR)
- --
- synonym
- --
- related or referenced term
- usage example
- --
Forms[edit]
- represented by form [Form]
- represented by form [Form]
- post- philosophy
- grammatical category
- noun (N)
- represented by form [Form]
- represented by form [Form]
- post-philosophies
- grammatical category
- plural noun (NP)
Usage notes[edit]
The term "post- philosophies" was used for a brief period around the time of MDem 4.3 — one or two entries posited the hypothetical existence of "post-Trotskyism" and "post-Lacanianism". By the time of MDem 5.3, this same concept is usually referred to as "meta- philosophies", and the constructs used are instead "meta-Trotskyism", "meta-anarchism", and "meta-Lacanianism". The major difference between these two sets of terms is that "postification" did not go into deep detail about how exactly ideologies were to be "post-ified", whereas the new terms invoke the concept of meta-ontology as one of the major engines of meta-Marxist analysis which is capable of operating on any philosophy ever conceived without the requirement for any other philosophy to accept historical materialism or class analysis.